Literature DB >> 12019596

How acceptable are financial incentives and written feedback for improving hypertension control? Perspectives from physicians, clinic administrators, and patients.

Sharon J Rolnick1, Karen L Margolis, Kristine K Fortman, Michael V Maciosek, Richard H Grimm.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess attitudes of physicians, clinic administrators, and patients within a health maintenance organization (HMO) toward using financial incentives to improve the control of hypertension. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive study of attitudes toward use of financial incentives paid to physicians or to clinic systems.
METHODS: Data were collected through physician survey (n = 104), interviews with clinic administrators (n = 24), and patient focus groups (n = 3) during the winter of 1999 and the spring of 2000. Analyses included both qualitative and quantitative approaches.
RESULTS: Most physicians (80%) supported additional funding to clinics to create systems to improve hypertension care. However, less than half supported direct payment to either groups of physicians (38%) or individual physicians (24%). Sixty-four percent of clinic administrators supported incentive payments to clinics to improve quality of care, whereas only 42% favored incentives to physicians. Patients had a uniformly favorable view of incentives paid to clinics, but were strongly opposed to direct physician incentives. Written feedback was supported by both clinic administrators (54%) and physicians (74%).
CONCLUSIONS: In this nonprofit HMO, none of the stakeholder groups supported direct incentive payments to physicians to improve hypertension control. Trials of financial incentives within managed care organizations should include study arms with clinic-based incentives. Further study is needed to determine if incentives to clinics, which appear to be acceptable, can actually improve blood pressure control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12019596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  3 in total

1.  Are physician reimbursement strategies associated with processes of care and patient satisfaction for patients with diabetes in managed care?

Authors:  Susan L Ettner; Theodore J Thompson; Mark R Stevens; Carol M Mangione; Catherine Kim; W Neil Steers; Jennifer Goewey; Arleen F Brown; Richard S Chung; K M Venkat Narayan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Therapeutic inertia and the Medicare crisis.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 3.  Systems for care of hypertension in the United States.

Authors:  Lawrence R Krakoff
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.