Literature DB >> 12018351

Cochlear implant candidacy and performance trends in children.

Mary Joe Osberger1, Sue Zimmerman-Phillips, Dawn Burton Koch.   

Abstract

Data from Clarion cochlear implant pediatric clinical trials were examined retrospectively to uncover trends in candidacy and postimplant benefit over time. In particular, age at implantation, educational setting, and communication mode were examined with respect to speech perception performance after implantation. The results showed that 1) age at implantation is decreasing, 2) children in oral education programs obtain more benefit from a cochlear implant than children in total communication programs, 3) children who undergo implantation before 2 years of age show greater benefit than children who undergo implantation between 2 and 3 years of age, 4) more younger children are using oral communication than older children, and 5) more children with good auditory skills before implantation and more residual hearing are undergoing implantation. In sum, in the 11 years since implants have been available to children in the United States, candidacy criteria have evolved and benefit has increased as cochlear implant technology has advanced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12018351     DOI: 10.1177/00034894021110s513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl        ISSN: 0096-8056


  9 in total

1.  The effect of age at cochlear implant initial stimulation on expressive language growth in infants and toddlers.

Authors:  J Bruce Tomblin; Brittan A Barker; Linda J Spencer; Xuyang Zhang; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Speech intelligibility in deaf children after long-term cochlear implant use.

Authors:  Jessica L Montag; Angela M AuBuchon; David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Aminoglycoside Increases Permeability of Osseous Spiral Laminae of Cochlea by Interrupting MMP-2 and MMP-9 Balance.

Authors:  Dengke Li; Jianhe Sun; Lidong Zhao; Weiwei Guo; Wei Sun; Shiming Yang
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.911

4.  Speech intelligibility of pediatric cochlear implant recipients with 7 years of device experience.

Authors:  Shu-Chen Peng; Linda J Spencer; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  [Present state of cochlear implant treatment in adults and children].

Authors:  J Maurer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Behavioral and electrophysiological measures of auditory change detection in children following late cochlear implantation: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dinces; Janie Chobot-Rhodd; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 1.675

7.  Speech Recognition and Parent Ratings From Auditory Development Questionnaires in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Elizabeth A Walker; Meredith Spratford; Jacob Oleson; Ruth Bentler; Lenore Holte; Patricia Roush
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Cochlear implants and ex vivo BDNF gene therapy protect spiral ganglion neurons.

Authors:  Darius Rejali; Valerie A Lee; Karen A Abrashkin; Nousheen Humayun; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Benefits and detriments of unilateral cochlear implant use on bilateral auditory development in children who are deaf.

Authors:  Karen A Gordon; Salima Jiwani; Blake C Papsin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.