Literature DB >> 12017328

Assessment of nodal involvement and survival analysis in breast cancer patients using image cytometric data: statistical, neural network and fuzzy approaches.

Huseyin Seker1, Michael O Odetayo, Dobrila Petrovic, Raouf N G Naguib, C Bartoli, L Alasio, M S Lakshmi, G V Sherbet.   

Abstract

Accurate and reliable decision making in breast cancer prognosis can help in the planning of suitable surgery and therapy and, generally, optimise patient management through the different stages of the disease. In recent years, several prognostic factors have been used as indicators of disease progression in breast cancer. In this paper we investigate a fuzzy method, namely fuzzy k-nearest neighbour technique for breast cancer prognosis, and for determining the significance of prognostic markers and subsets of the markers, which include histology type, tumour grade, DNA ploidy, S-phase fraction, G0G1/G2M ratio, and minimum (start) and maximum (end) nuclear pleomorphism indices. We also compare the method with (a) logistic regression as a statistical method, and (b) multilayer feed forward backpropagation neural networks as an artificial neural network tool, the latter two techniques having been widely used for cancer prognosis. Nodal involvement and survival analyses in breast cancer are carried out for 100 women who were clinically diagnosed with breast disease in the form of carcinoma and benign conditions, and seven prognostic markers collected for each patient. For nodal involvement analysis, node positive and negative patients are predicted whereas survival analysis is carried out for two categories: whether a patient is alive or dead within 5 years of diagnosis. The results obtained show that the fuzzy method yields the highest predictive accuracy of 88% for both nodal involvement and survival analyses obtained from the subsets of [tumour grade, S-phase fraction, minimum (start) nuclear pleomorphism index] and [tumour histology type, DNA ploidy, S-phase fraction, G0G1/G2M ratio], respectively. We believe that this technique has produced more reliable prognostic factor models than those obtained using either the statistical or artificial neural networks-based methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12017328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  10 in total

1.  Nuclear envelope irregularity is induced by RET/PTC during interphase.

Authors:  Andrew H Fischer; Panya Taysavang; Sissy M Jhiang
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Computational neural network analysis of the affinity of lobeline and tetrabenazine analogs for the vesicular monoamine transporter-2.

Authors:  Fang Zheng; Guangrong Zheng; A Gabriela Deaciuc; Chang-Guo Zhan; Linda P Dwoskin; Peter A Crooks
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2007-02-11       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  Design, synthesis and interaction at the vesicular monoamine transporter-2 of lobeline analogs: potential pharmacotherapies for the treatment of psychostimulant abuse.

Authors:  Peter A Crooks; Guangrong Zheng; Ashish P Vartak; John P Culver; Fang Zheng; David B Horton; Linda P Dwoskin
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Prediction of the axillary lymph node status in mammary cancer on the basis of clinicopathological data and flow cytometry.

Authors:  T Mattfeldt; H A Kestler; H P Sinn
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Prediction of nodal spread of breast cancer by using artificial neural network-based analyses of S100A4, nm23 and steroid receptor expression.

Authors:  S R Grey; S S Dlay; B E Leone; F Cajone; G V Sherbet
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  The prognostic significance of determining DNA content in breast cancer by DNA image cytometry: the role of high grade aneuploidy in node negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Selma Yildirim-Assaf; Alexandra Coumbos; Werner Hopfenmüller; Hans-Dieter Foss; Harald Stein; Wolfgang Kühn
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis.

Authors:  Joseph A Cruz; David S Wishart
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-02-11

8.  Comparative analysis of logistic regression, support vector machine and artificial neural network for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid breast tumors by the use of three-dimensional power Doppler imaging.

Authors:  Shou-Tung Chen; Yi-Hsuan Hsiao; Yu-Len Huang; Shou-Jen Kuo; Hsin-Shun Tseng; Hwa-Koon Wu; Dar-Ren Chen
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Gene expression array profile of human osteosarcoma.

Authors:  P Leonard; T Sharp; S Henderson; D Hewitt; J Pringle; A Sandison; A Goodship; J Whelan; C Boshoff
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Reporting and methodological quality of survival analysis in articles published in Chinese oncology journals.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Zhu; Xiaobin Zhou; Yuan Zhang; Xiao Sun; Haihua Liu; Yingying Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.