Literature DB >> 12017141

Identifying the attributes of instructional quality in ambulatory teaching sites: a validation study of the MedEd IQ.

Paul A James1, Clarence D Kreiter, Judith Shipengrover, Jesse Crosson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Instructional quality in ambulatory settings may vary. The MedEd IQ is an instrument that measures unique aspects of the clinical instructional process. This study assesses the construct and factorial validity of the MedEd IQ.
METHODS: First-year students (n = 764) in Introduction to Clinical Medicine courses and third-year students (n = 711) in family medicine clerkships evaluated 249 clinical teaching sites affiliated with two medical schools, using MedEd IQ questionnaires at the conclusion of clinical training (1996-2000). Factor structures were identified and relationally defined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic techniques, and a measurement model for assessing instructional quality was refined.
RESULTS: Four unique factors were identified that contribute to instructional quality: preceptor activities, learning environment, learner involvement, and learning opportunities. Of 33 items within the instrument, 22 were retained in the final structural model. Two indices of fit, a comparativefit index of .935, and a root mean square error of approximation of .063 indicated close agreement between the defined model and the observed relationships between items.
CONCLUSIONS: The MedEd IQ measures four factors important to ambulatory medical education and provides a basis for a new measurement approach to assessing instructional quality.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12017141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  6 in total

1.  The current status of medical student education in family medicine.

Authors:  Thomas C Rosenthal; Joseph Hobbs; Paul James; Warren Newton
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Predictive Relationships Between Students' Evaluation Ratings and Course Satisfaction.

Authors:  Catherine B Terry; Keri L Heitner; Leslie A Miller; Clea Hollis
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 3.  Assessing the quality of clinical teachers: a systematic review of content and quality of questionnaires for assessing clinical teachers.

Authors:  Cornelia R M G Fluit; Sanneke Bolhuis; Richard Grol; Roland Laan; Michel Wensing
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Determining the quality of educational climate across multiple undergraduate teaching sites using the DREEM inventory.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Ekta Tiyagi; Janesh K Gupta
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2005-02-21       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Student evaluation of a primary care clerkship: quality assurance and identification of potential for improvement.

Authors:  Jean-François Chenot; Michael M Kochen; Wolfgang Himmel
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Students' perceptions of the instructional quality of district hospital-based training.

Authors:  Shehla Jabbar Memon; Jakobus Murray Louw; Martin Bac; Jannie Hugo; Waqar-Un Nisa Rauf; John Edward Sandars
Journal:  Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med       Date:  2016-07-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.