Literature DB >> 12015542

Selection of obstetrics and gynecology residents on the basis of medical school performance.

Jeffrey G Bell1, Ioanna Kanellitsas, Lynn Shaffer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether United States Medical Licensing Examination scores during medical school predict resident-in-training examination scores and whether other criteria of medical student performance correlate with the faculty's subjective evaluation of resident performance. STUDY
DESIGN: United States Medical Licensing Examination step I and II scores for 24 residents were compared to their scores on in-training examinations. Faculty evaluated 20 graduated residents by rating both their cognitive and noncognitive clinical performance. Scores from these evaluations were compared with several criteria of their medical school performance. Statistical analysis for all comparisons was linear regression.
RESULTS: United States Medical Licensing Examination scores positively correlated with in-training examination scores. United States Medical Licensing Examination scores, honor grades in student clinical rotations, and student interview scores did not correlate with the faculty evaluation of resident performance.
CONCLUSION: Standardized tests of medical student cognitive function predict the resident's performance on standardized tests. Selection criteria that are based on other medical school achievements do not necessarily correlate with overall performance as residents in obstetrics and gynecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12015542     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.121622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

1.  Developing a predictive model to assess applicants to an internal medicine residency.

Authors:  David Neely; Joseph Feinglass; Warren H Wallace
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-03

2.  Can medical school performance predict residency performance? Resident selection and predictors of successful performance in obstetrics and gynecology.

Authors:  Hindi E Stohl; Nancy A Hueppchen; Jessica L Bienstock
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-09

3.  The effect of blinded versus nonblinded interviews in the resident selection process.

Authors:  Lois E Brustman; Fern L Williams; Katherine Carroll; Heather Lurie; Eric Ganz; Oded Langer
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-09

Review 4.  Use of the Interview in Resident Candidate Selection: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alyssa Stephenson-Famy; Brenda S Houmard; Sidharth Oberoi; Anton Manyak; Seine Chiang; Sara Kim
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-12

5.  Prolonged delays for research training in medical school are associated with poorer subsequent clinical knowledge.

Authors:  Liselotte N Dyrbye; Matthew R Thomas; Neena Natt; Charles H Rohren
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The Effect of a Targeted Educational Activity on Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident In-Training Examination Scores.

Authors:  Ingrid Chern; Clyner Antalan; Tod Aeby; Mark Hiraoka
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2018-07

7.  Predictors of orthodontic residency performance: An assessment of scholastic and demographic selection parameters.

Authors:  Andrew C Grillo; Ahmed A M Ghoneima; Lawrence P Garetto; Surya S Bhamidipalli; Kelton T Stewart
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  The Utility of Letters of Recommendation in Predicting Resident Success: Can the ACGME Competencies Help?

Authors:  Hindi E Stohl; Nancy A Hueppchen; Jessica L Bienstock
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-09

9.  Use of Filters for Residency Application Review: Results From the Internal Medicine In-Training Examination Program Director Survey.

Authors:  Adam M Garber; Brian Kwan; Christopher M Williams; Steven V Angus; T Robert Vu; Matthew Hollon; Marty Muntz; Arlene Weissman; Anne Pereira
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-12

10.  Medical Students' Reflections on the Recent Changes to the USMLE Step Exams.

Authors:  Peter T Cangialosi; Brian C Chung; Torin P Thielhelm; Nicholas D Camarda; Dylan S Eiger
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 7.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.