Literature DB >> 12014488

Assessment of the number of eye symptoms and the impact of some confounding variables for office staff in non-air-conditioned buildings.

Michael J Doughty1, Kenneth A Blades, Nassim Ibrahim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was both to assess the frequency of self-reported eye symptoms for employees in a non-air-conditioned office building complex, and to specifically assess whether confounding variables (contact lens wear, medicines use, and provoking stimuli) had a discernible impact on the characteristics of this reporting.
METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed, in the winter months, to office employees in a building complex within a city-located University site, consisting of non-air-conditioned rooms with some mechanical ventilation. The questionnaire asked respondents to identify any eye symptoms experienced (foreign body sensation, soreness, dryness, grittiness, itchiness, stinging, intense burning), the frequency of their occurrence, details of any conditions provoking eye symptoms (such as changes in the microenvironment), their medication use and if they were contact lens wearers.
RESULTS: The proportion of respondents for various categories was calculated, along with the total number of symptoms. If 'eye irritation' is considered as reporting any symptoms experienced at any time, then 63% of 292 respondents (median age 42.5 years) reported an average of 1.83 symptoms. However, the identification of contact lens wearers, medication use (especially for seasonal allergies) and provoking stimuli reduced this prevalence to just 29% (with the average number of symptoms being 1.51). If the frequency of experiencing symptoms was also taken into account (never, sometimes, often, and constantly), then only 12.3% of the respondents indicated symptoms often or constantly, i.e. could be considered to have significant symptoms. In all categories, men were more likely to report eye symptoms compared with women.
CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm that office employees are likely to have some ocular symptoms, but that even a simple consideration of possible confounding variables can greatly change the reported prevalence of eye irritation that might be specifically associated with the workplace environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12014488     DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00013.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Dry eye. An update on epidemiology, diagnosis, therapy and new concepts].

Authors:  F Schirra; K W Ruprecht
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  Eye complaints in the office environment: precorneal tear film integrity influenced by eye blinking efficiency.

Authors:  P Wolkoff; J K Nøjgaard; P Troiano; B Piccoli
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  An assessment of the pattern of spontaneous eyeblink activity under the influence of topical ocular anaesthesia.

Authors:  Taher Naase; Michael J Doughty; Norman F Button
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Frequent spontaneous eyeblink activity associated with reduced conjunctival surface (trigeminal nerve) tactile sensitivity.

Authors:  Michael J Doughty; Taher Naase; Norman F Button
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Common symptoms of Nepalese soft contact lens wearers: A pilot study.

Authors:  Kishor Sapkota; Raul Martin; Sandra Franco; Madalena Lira
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-02-07

6.  Spontaneous eyeblink activity under different conditions of gaze (eye position) and visual glare.

Authors:  Michael J Doughty
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Effect of central corneal thickness on Goldmann applanation tonometry measures - a different result with different pachymeters.

Authors:  Michael J Doughty; Sven Jonuscheit
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.117

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.