Literature DB >> 12012612

Screening for speech and language disorders: the reliability, validity and accuracy of the General Language Screen.

Carol M Stott1, Melanie J Merricks, Patrick F Bolton, Ian M Goodyer.   

Abstract

This paper reports the reliability, validity and accuracy of the General Language Screen (GLS) as the first stage in its development as a potential screening instrument for the identification of speech and language disorder (SLD) in the primary care setting. Data reported were obtained during the Cambridge Language and Speech Project (CLASP) a longitudinal epidemiological study of primary SLD. The GLS was originally used in initial CLASP sample ascertainment when children were aged 36 months. This report utilises speech and language data collected at subsequent stages of this study (37-months, 45-months and 8-years) to determine the reliability, validity and accuracy of the GLS. The GLS demonstrated sufficient levels of reliability (internal consistency alpha = 0.74) and validity (criterion validity r = -0.55). Adequate construct validity was demonstrated by a factor analysis in which two language related factors were identified. These data therefore justified exploration of the accuracy of the GLS as a screening instrument. Analysis of accuracy in this context is complicated by lack of a generally accepted method of defining SLD case status. This report utilises data on language function at different stages of development to provide measures of GLS accuracy over time. Concurrent accuracy, measured against parental report of language function at 37-months, was good (ROC area under the curve = 0.93). Predictive accuracy measured against direct assessment of speech and language at 45-months and 8-years was, as expected, somewhat less (ROC = 0.77 and 0.68 respectively). The implications for the use of the GLS as a screening instrument are discussed. The data indicate that the GLS would function most usefully as the first stage of a two-stage screen for SLD in the primary care setting. Recommendations are made as to the nature of the second stage of such a screen and plans for future research are outlined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12012612     DOI: 10.1080/13682820110116785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord        ISSN: 1368-2822            Impact factor:   3.020


  11 in total

Review 1.  Assessing child and adolescent pragmatic language competencies: toward evidence-based assessments.

Authors:  Robert L Russell; Kenneth L Grizzle
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-06

2.  Relations Between Toddler Expressive Language and Temper Tantrums in a Community Sample.

Authors:  Brittany L Manning; Megan Y Roberts; Ryne Estabrook; Amélie Petitclerc; James L Burns; Margaret Briggs-Gowan; Lauren S Wakschlag; Elizabeth S Norton
Journal:  J Appl Dev Psychol       Date:  2019-11-04

3.  Measuring Social Motivation in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Development of the Social Motivation Interview.

Authors:  Rebecca Elias; Susan W White
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2020-03

4.  A genomewide scan identifies two novel loci involved in specific language impairment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01-04       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Language status at age 3: Group and individual prediction from vocabulary comprehension in the second year.

Authors:  Margaret Friend; Erin Smolak; Tamara Patrucco-Nanchen; Diane Poulin-Dubois; Pascal Zesiger
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2018-10-25

6.  Determinants of response to a parent questionnaire about development and behaviour in 3 year olds: European multicentre study of congenital toxoplasmosis.

Authors:  A Salt; K Freeman; A Prusa; N Ferret; W Buffolano; G Malm; D Schmidt; H K Tan; R E Gilbert; E Petersen
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 2.125

7.  Predictive validity of preschool screening tools for language and behavioural difficulties: A PRISMA systematic review.

Authors:  Fiona Sim; Lucy Thompson; Louise Marryat; Nitish Ramparsad; Philip Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Screening Tools for Language Disorder.

Authors:  Kevin K H So; Carol K S To
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 9.  Developmental Language Disorder: Early Predictors, Age for the Diagnosis, and Diagnostic Tools. A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Alessandra Sansavini; Maria Elena Favilla; Maria Teresa Guasti; Andrea Marini; Stefania Millepiedi; Maria Valeria Di Martino; Simona Vecchi; Nadia Battajon; Laura Bertolo; Olga Capirci; Barbara Carretti; Maria Paola Colatei; Cristina Frioni; Luigi Marotta; Sara Massa; Letizia Michelazzo; Chiara Pecini; Silvia Piazzalunga; Manuela Pieretti; Pasquale Rinaldi; Renata Salvadorini; Cristiano Termine; Mariagrazia Zuccarini; Simonetta D'Amico; Anna Giulia De Cagno; Maria Chiara Levorato; Tiziana Rossetto; Maria Luisa Lorusso
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-17

10.  Early language development in Indian children: A population-based pilot study.

Authors:  Manjit Sidhu; Prahbhjot Malhi; Jagat Jerath
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.383

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.