Literature DB >> 12010161

Bone collected during dental implant surgery: a clinical and histological study.

Malcolm Peter Jackson Young1, Helen Victoria Worthington, Richard Ernest Lloyd, David Bernard Drucker, Philip Sloan, Duncan Howard Carter.   

Abstract

Bone traps vary in design, although the effect of pore size on the nature of the debris collected in vivo has not yet been established. The aims of this study were 1) to compare the clinical performance of two bone collectors during implant surgery, ii) to establish the mass of tissue collected by each device, and iii) to characterize the nature of the collected debris. Thirty-eight patients (paired for implant site) were categorised into three clinical groups according to the site and the number of implants they were to receive. Patients underwent bone collection with the Frios bone trap or the Osseous Coagulum Trap according to a randomisation sequence. The samples were fixed in formalin, frozen, freeze-dried and weighed. Material from each sample was embedded in paraffin wax and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. All sections were examined by optical microscopy and the proportion of bone to coagulum was established histomorphometrically. During surgery, the Frios bone trap blocked once and the Osseous Coagulum Trap blocked 11 times. In all cases where blockage occurred, excess coagulum was apparent. All the samples that were collected by the Frios bone trap contained bone and coagulum, with a mean proportion of 90.6% bone. With regard to the Osseous Coagulum Trap, one sample contained no bone and two samples contained only trace amounts of bone; the remaining samples contained a mean proportion of 67.3% bone. Pore size affects both clinical performance and the histological composition of the debris collected, and this might have important implications if used as an augmentation material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12010161     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130310.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  7 in total

Review 1.  The management of traumatic tooth loss with dental implants: Part 1.

Authors:  J Chesterman; R Chauhan; M Patel; M F W-Y Chan
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of osteoblast-like cells obtained from two techniques for harvesting intraoral bone grafts.

Authors:  Francisco Javier Manzano-Moreno; Juan Bautista Rodríguez-Martínez; Javier Ramos-Torrecillas; Manuel Francisco Vallecillo-Capilla; Concepción Ruiz; Olga García-Martínez; Candela Reyes-Botella
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Temperature change in pig rib bone during implant site preparation by low-speed drilling.

Authors:  Sun-Jong Kim; Jaeyoung Yoo; Young-Soo Kim; Sang-Wan Shin
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  A Novel Osteotomy Preparation Technique to Preserve Implant Site Viability and Enhance Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Chih-Hao Chen; Benjamin R Coyac; Masaki Arioka; Brian Leahy; U Serdar Tulu; Maziar Aghvami; Stefan Holst; Waldemar Hoffmann; Antony Quarry; Oded Bahat; Benjamin Salmon; John B Brunski; Jill A Helms
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Application of reverse drilling technique in alveolar ridge expansion.

Authors:  Chen-Chih Chen; Ming-Dih Jeng
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.719

6.  Autogenous bone block in the treatment of teeth with hopeless prognosis.

Authors:  Nymphea Pandit; I K Pandit; Rajvir Malik; Deepika Bali; Shaifi Jindal
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-10

7.  Exposed Dental Implant? Local Autograft A Saviour!

Authors:  Raj Rai; Prashant A Punde; Harshal Suryavanshi; Swetha Shree
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.