Literature DB >> 12009354

A low number of retrieved oocytes at in vitro fertilization treatment is predictive of early menopause.

Evelien J de Boer1, Isolde den Tonkelaar, Egbert R te Velde, Curt W Burger, Helen Klip, Flora E van Leeuwen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether women with a low number of retrieved oocytes at the first in vitro fertilization (IVF) attempt have an increased risk of early menopause.
DESIGN: Nested case-control study.
SETTING: Twelve IVF clinics in the Netherlands. PATIENT(S): Women participating in a nationwide Dutch cohort study (OMEGA) of ovarian stimulation for IVF and subsequent gynecologic diseases (n = 26,428). Each patient who experienced natural menopause at or before 46 years (n = 38) was individually matched to five controls (n = 190) who had not yet entered menopause at the age the patient became postmenopausal. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Relative risk of reaching natural menopause at an early age (</=46 years), according to the number of retrieved oocytes at the first IVF attempt. RESULT(S): Women with a poor response (zero to three oocytes) had a relative risk of 11.6 (95% confidence interval: 3.9-34.7) of having an early menopause as compared with women who have a normal response (> three oocytes). Women who were stimulated with gonadotropins during IVF treatment but did not undergo an IVF puncture because of an anticipated poor response (canceled IVF cycle) had a relative risk of 8.3 (95% confidence interval: 2.9-23.9).
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that women with a low number of retrieved oocytes at the first IVF treatment are more likely to become postmenopausal at an early age than women with a higher number of retrieved oocytes. Our study is the first longitudinal study to provide strong evidence for the quantitative aspect of the ovarian concept of reproductive aging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12009354     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)02972-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  20 in total

Review 1.  Genetic associations with diminished ovarian reserve: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Alexis D Greene; George Patounakis; James H Segars
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Do young women with unexplained infertility show manifestations of decreased ovarian reserve?

Authors:  Noa Abrahami; Ido Izhaki; Johnny S Younis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Influence of follicular fluid and cumulus cells on oocyte quality: clinical implications.

Authors:  M G Da Broi; V S I Giorgi; F Wang; D L Keefe; D Albertini; P A Navarro
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  A changing perspective: improving access to fertility preservation.

Authors:  Joseph M Letourneau; Michelle E Melisko; Marcelle I Cedars; Mitchell P Rosen
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Enhanced hypothalamic-pituitary sensitivity to estrogen in premenopausal women with diminished ovarian reserve compared with older perimenopausal controls.

Authors:  Katie Zhang; Gohar Zeitlian; Goli Adel; Nanette F Santoro; Lubna Pal
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Effects of reproductive history on symptoms of menopause: a brief report.

Authors:  Deborah B Nelson; Mary D Sammel; Freda Patterson; Hui Lin; Clarisa R Gracia; Ellen W Freeman
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Correlation of telomere length and telomerase activity with occult ovarian insufficiency.

Authors:  Samantha Butts; Harold Riethman; Sarah Ratcliffe; Alka Shaunik; Christos Coutifaris; Kurt Barnhart
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 8.  Different ovarian stimulation protocols for women with diminished ovarian reserve.

Authors:  D Loutradis; P Drakakis; E Vomvolaki; A Antsaklis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Simple tools for assessment of ovarian reserve (OR): individual ovarian dimensions are reliable predictors of OR.

Authors:  Stacea Bowen; John Norian; Nanette Santoro; Lubna Pal
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Biological versus chronological ovarian age: implications for assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Carlo Alviggi; Peter Humaidan; Colin M Howles; Donald Tredway; Stephen G Hillier
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.