Literature DB >> 17412332

Simple tools for assessment of ovarian reserve (OR): individual ovarian dimensions are reliable predictors of OR.

Stacea Bowen1, John Norian, Nanette Santoro, Lubna Pal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between individual ovarian dimensions, advancing age, and declining ovarian reserve (OR) in an infertile population.
DESIGN: An ongoing prospective observational study.
SETTING: Academic infertility practice. PATIENT(S): Sixty-nine premenopausal women presenting for the evaluation and management of infertility. INTERVENTION(S): Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the ovarian dimensions (length, width, and overall diameter in cm) and evaluation of the OR status by measuring serum levels of FSH and E(2) in the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Relationship of the individual ovarian dimensions to age (years) and OR (reflected by historical maximal FSH levels). RESULT(S): A statistically significant decrease in three ovarian size parameters accompanied advancing age (ovarian width, r = -0.30; ovarian length, r = -0.24; and the mean overall ovarian diameter, r = -0.30). Levels of FSH demonstrated a significant and linear correlation with age (r = 0.39). Increasing levels of FSH (and hence declining OR) were associated with statistically significant declines in the mean ovarian width (r = -0.39), length (r = -0.38), and overall mean ovarian diameter (r = -.42), Patients with a known diagnosis of diminished OR demonstrated significantly reduced ovarian dimensions compared with patients with other infertility etiologies. Multivariate linear regression analysis confirmed individual ovarian measurements (width, length, and overall diameter) as independent predictors of OR (FSH levels) after adjusting for parameters that are known to influence ovarian size, i.e., age, smoking status, body mass index, and anovulation history. Ovarian width emerged as the strongest predictor of OR (largest beta coefficient and hence the strongest association with OR status), compared with ovarian length and the mean ovarian diameter. CONCLUSION(S): Single ovarian dimensions are reliable predictors of advancing age and declining OR status in premenopausal infertile women. The magnitude of this association is most robust for the ovarian width.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17412332      PMCID: PMC2000481          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  41 in total

1.  Repeated testing of basal FSH levels has no predictive value for IVF outcome in women with elevated basal FSH.

Authors:  H Abdalla; M Y Thum
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve.

Authors:  László F J M M Bancsi; Frank J M Broekmans; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Frank H de Jong; J Dik F Habbema; Egbert R te Velde
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Accuracy of ovarian reserve tests.

Authors:  B Gülekli; Y Bulbul; A Onvural; K Yorukoglu; C Posaci; N Demir; O Erten
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  An elevated day three follicle-stimulating hormone:luteinizing hormone ratio (FSH:LH) in the presence of a normal day 3 FSH predicts a poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

Authors:  T Mukherjee; A B Copperman; R Lapinski; B Sandler; M Bustillo; L Grunfeld
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  The effects of smoking on ovarian function and fertility during assisted reproduction cycles.

Authors:  B J Van Voorhis; J D Dawson; D W Stovall; A E Sparks; C H Syrop
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Day 3 serum inhibin B and FSH and age as predictors of assisted reproduction treatment outcome.

Authors:  M Creus; J Peñarrubia; F Fábregues; E Vidal; F Carmona; R Casamitjana; J A Vanrell; J Balasch
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Basal antral follicle number and mean ovarian diameter predict cycle cancellation and ovarian responsiveness in assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Authors:  J L Frattarelli; D F Lauria-Costab; B T Miller; P A Bergh; R T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Pretreatment transvaginal ultrasound examination predicts ovarian responsiveness to gonadotrophins in in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  C Tomas; S Nuojua-Huttunen; H Martikainen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in-vitro fertilization can predict poor response.

Authors:  A Lass; J Skull; E McVeigh; R Margara; R M Winston
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Cigarette smoking accelerates the development of diminished ovarian reserve as evidenced by the clomiphene citrate challenge test.

Authors:  F I Sharara; S N Beatse; M R Leonardi; D Navot; R T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian reserve evaluation: state of the art.

Authors:  Bruno Ramalho de Carvalho; Ana Carolina Japur de Sá Rosa e Silva; Júlio César Rosa e Silva; Rosana Maria dos Reis; Rui Alberto Ferriani; Marcos Felipe Silva de Sá
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Vasomotor symptoms in infertile premenopausal women: a hitherto unappreciated risk for low bone mineral density.

Authors:  Lubna Pal; John Norian; Gohar Zeitlian; Kris Bevilacqua; Ruth Freeman; Nanette Santoro
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Ovarian volume correlates strongly with the number of nongrowing follicles in the human ovary.

Authors:  Thomas W Kelsey; W Hamish B Wallace
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2012-02-12

4.  Ovarian reserve assessment for infertility investigation.

Authors:  Bruno Ramalho de Carvalho; David Barreira Gomes Sobrinho; Andréa Duarte Damasceno Vieira; Manoela Porto Silva Resende; Antônio César Paes Barbosa; Adelino Amaral Silva; Hitomi Miura Nakagava
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-01-26

5.  Association between individual ovarian dimensions with ovarian reserve indices.

Authors:  Elham Hashemian Naeini; Mohammad Zare Neyestanak; Katayon Berjis; Mostafa Shokoohi
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.068

6.  Egg Quality and Pregnancy Outcome in Young Infertile Women with Diminished Ovarian Reserve.

Authors:  Yajie Chang; Jingjie Li; Xiaolan Li; Hong'e Liu; Xiaoyan Liang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-10-12

7.  Biomarkers of Ovarian Reserve.

Authors:  William E Roudebush; Wendy J Kivens; Jessica M Mattke
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2008-04-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.