Literature DB >> 12008191

The role of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer. a systematic review.

K Flobbe1, P J Nelemans, A G H Kessels, G L Beets, M F von Meyenfeldt, J M A van Engelshoven.   

Abstract

The aim of this review was to summarise the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer and to identify clinical indications. A systematic review was performed of all publications in MEDLINE and EMBASE between 1990 and 2000 on the role of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography. 22 studies were included, showing a large variety of indications for ultrasonography and variations in the diagnostic performance of mammography and ultrasonography. There were six studies comparing a combined diagnosis of mammography and ultrasonography together with mammography alone, of which three studies had an increased sensitivity at the cost of a lower specificity. The methods of selecting the study population and interpretation of ultrasonography significantly influenced the diagnostic performance of mammography and ultrasonography relative to each other (P=0.003, P=0.03, respectively). Based on the studies reviewed, little evidence-based support was found to confirm the well recognised value of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer in clinical practice. Furthermore, no clinical indications for additional ultrasonography could be defined. The heterogeneity in the diagnostic performance in these studies may be explained by the methods of patient selection and ultrasonography interpretation, as well as by their poor quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12008191     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00388-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  12 in total

1.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic imaging in symptomatic breast patients: team and individual performance.

Authors:  P Britton; J Warwick; M G Wallis; S O'Keeffe; K Taylor; R Sinnatamby; S Barter; M Gaskarth; S W Duffy; G C Wishart
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Ultrasonographic elastography of the breast using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: preliminary study.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Sachiko Isobe; Miki Yamaguchi; Yukari Ogawa; Kanako Homma; Masahiro Saito; Chanwoong Joo; Eisuke Fukuma
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-07-24       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Ultrasonographic tissue quantification of the breast using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: phantom study and clinical application.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Masahiro Saito; Chanwoong Joo; Miki Yamaguchi; Sachiko Isobe; Yukari Ogawa; Kanako Homma; Eisuke Fukuma
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Combination of elastography and tissue quantification using the acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology for differential diagnosis of breast masses.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Sachiko Isobe; Masaaki Sakamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Category assessment based on 3D volume data acquired by automated breast ultrasonography.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Eisuke Fukuma
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Detectability of breast lesions under the nipple using an automated breast volume scanner: comparison with handheld ultrasonography.

Authors:  Sachiko Isobe; Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Miki Yamaguchi; Yukari Ogawa; Kanako Homma; Rie Satomi; Masahiro Saito; Chanwoong Joo; Eisuke Fukuma
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Optimal scanning technique to cover the whole breast using an automated breast volume scanner.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Sachiko Isobe; Miki Yamaguchi; Yukari Ogawa; Masami Kohara; Chanwoong Joo; Eisuke Fukuma
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 2.374

8.  Scintimammography with 99mTc-MIBI and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of breast cancer.

Authors:  B Bagni; A Franceschetto; A Casolo; M De Santis; I Bagni; F Pansini; C Di Leo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Diagnostic utility of combined ultrasonography and mammography in the evaluation of women with mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  C De Felice; S Savelli; M Angeletti; L Ballesio; L Manganaro; M L Meggiorini; L M Porfiri
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2007-07-26

10.  Can mechanical imaging increase the specificity of mammography screening?

Authors:  Magnus Dustler; Daniel Förnvik; Pontus Timberg; Ingvar Andersson; Hannie Petersson; Håkan Brorson; Anders Tingberg; Sophia Zackrisson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.