Literature DB >> 12007950

Prospective randomized trial of HDR brachytherapy as a sole modality in palliation of advanced esophageal carcinoma--an International Atomic Energy Agency study.

Ranjan K Sur1, C Victor Levin, Bernard Donde, Vinay Sharma, Leszek Miszczyk, Subir Nag.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies from South Africa have established that fractionated high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy gives the best results in terms of palliation and survival in advanced esophageal cancer. A multicenter, prospective randomized study was therefore conducted under the auspices of the International Atomic Energy Agency to evaluate two HDR regimens. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Surgically inoperable patients with histologically proven squamous cell cancer of the esophagus, tumor >5 cm in length on barium swallow and/or endoscopy, Karnofsky performance score >50, age 17-70 years, primary disease in the thoracic esophagus, no prior malignancy within the past 5 years, and any N or M status were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included cervical esophagus location, tumor extending <1 cm from the gastroesophageal junction, tracheoesophageal fistula, Karnofsky performance score <50, altered mental status, and extension to great vessels on CT. Patients were randomized to receive 18 Gy in 3 fractions on alternate days (6 Gy per fraction, Group A) or 16 Gy in 2 fractions on alternate days (8 Gy per fraction, Group B). The HDR dose was prescribed at 1 cm from the center of the source axis after dose optimization. A margin of 2 cm was included proximally and distally. The respective hospital and university committees gave approval for the study, and all patients provided informed consent.
RESULTS: A total of 232 patients were entered into the study (112 in Group A and 120 in Group B). There was no difference between the groups for any of the prognostic variables. All patients were followed until death. The dysphagia-free survival for the whole group was 7.1 months (Group A, 7.8 months; Group B, 6.3 months; p >0.05). The overall survival was 7.9 months for the whole group (Group A, 9.1 months; Group B, 6.9 months; p >0.05). On univariate analysis, the presenting weight (p = 0.0083), gender (p = 0.0038), race (p = 0.0105), the presenting dysphagia score (p = 0.0083), the treatment center (p = 0.0029), and tumor grade (p = 0.0029) had an impact on the dysphagia-free survival, and gender (p = 0.0011) and performance score (p = 0.0060) had an impact on dysphagia-free survival on multivariate analysis. Only age had an impact on overall survival on both univariate (p = 0.0430) and multivariate (p = 0.0331) analysis. The incidence of strictures (Group A, n = 12; Group B, n = 13; p >0.05) and fistulas (Group A, n = 11; Group B, n = 12; p >0.05) was similar in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Fractionated HDR brachytherapy alone is an effective method of palliating advanced esophageal cancers, surpassing the results of any other modality of treatment presently available. Dose fractions of 6 Gy x 3 and 8 Gy x 2 give similar results for dysphagia-free survival, overall survival, strictures, and fistulas and are equally effective in palliation of advanced esophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12007950     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02702-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  23 in total

1.  Evolution in brachytherapy.

Authors:  Hugo Marsiglia; Enrique Chajon
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Recommendations of the Spanish Brachytherapy Group of SEOR for HDR endoluminal treatments. Part 1: Oesophagus.

Authors:  Á Rovirosa; J Anchuelo; V Crispin; C Gutiérrez; A Herreros; I Herruzo; J C Menéndez; P Pino; A Polo; S Rodríguez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  High dose-rate endoluminal brachytherapy for primary and recurrent esophageal cancer : Experience from a large single-center cohort.

Authors:  Nils H Nicolay; Johanna Rademacher; Jan Oelmann-Avendano; Jürgen Debus; Peter E Huber; Katja Lindel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 4.  Treatment for unresectable or metastatic oesophageal cancer: current evidence and trends.

Authors:  Peter S N van Rossum; Nadia Haj Mohammad; Frank P Vleggaar; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 5.  Is Clinical Research in Oesophageal Cancer in South Africa in Crisis? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  E Loots; B Sartorius; T E Madiba; C J J Mulder; D L Clarke
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  [Palliative treatment options for esophageal and gastric cancer].

Authors:  A Eickhoff; R Jakobs; J F Riemann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.743

7.  The need for a national cancer policy in Malawi.

Authors:  Yohannie Mlombe; Nicholas Othieno-Abinya; Charles Dzamalala; John Chisi
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 0.875

Review 8.  Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yingxue Dai; Chaoying Li; Yao Xie; Xudong Liu; Jianxin Zhang; Jing Zhou; Xiongfei Pan; Shujuan Yang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-30

9.  High dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in locally advanced oesophageal cancer. Clinic response and survival related to biological equivalent dose (BED).

Authors:  Maria C López Carrizosa; P Maria Samper Ots; A Rodríguez Pérez; A Sotoca; J Sáez Garrido; M M de Miguel
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.340

10.  Cost study of metal stent placement vs single-dose brachytherapy in the palliative treatment of oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  S Polinder; M Y V Homs; P D Siersema; E W Steyerberg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.