Literature DB >> 17594953

High dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in locally advanced oesophageal cancer. Clinic response and survival related to biological equivalent dose (BED).

Maria C López Carrizosa1, P Maria Samper Ots, A Rodríguez Pérez, A Sotoca, J Sáez Garrido, M M de Miguel.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ninety percent of oesophageal cancers are locally advanced at diagnosis, and treatment yields discouraging results. High dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) permits an increment of local doses without a significant increment of toxicity. The goal of our study is to compare different HDR-BT fractions and assess global survival (GS) and cause-specific survival (CSS).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients were treated for locally advanced oesophageal cancer with chemotherapy concomitant with conformal three-dimensional radiotherapy (C3DR) from January 1994 to December 2000. Of this group, 96.2% were males, mean age 63.08 years; the most frequent location was medium third, for 50% of cases. Eighty-four percent of cases were G2-3 epidermoid carcinomas. The administration consisted of 44.2 Gy with C3DR and 5 applications of HDR-BT of 500 cGy each.
RESULTS: Actuarial GS and CSS at 5 years is 10.18% and 12.96%, a mean survival of 25.68 and 29.14 months respectively. The following factors (C3DR total dose, fraction dose and total dose of HDR-BT, number of applications, active length of application, total dose of C3DR plus HDR-BT, and BED of HDR-BT) are evaluated to find if they have an influence on treatment response, GS and actuarial CSS. The only result that yields statistical significance, in univariant analysis, is the active length in HDR-BT, thus for a greater active length of application, a minor response is obtained and GS diminishes (p=0.05). We grouped BT fractions on biological equivalent dose (BED) into: <28, 28-33 and >33 Gy; mean survival and GS at 5 years increases with BED>or=28 Gy (p=0.016).
CONCLUSION: Tumour response increases (complete and partial) when BED on HDR-BT is increased, regardless of the fraction employed. A BED higher than 28 Gy yields a significant increase of mean survival and GS at 5 years (p=0.016).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17594953     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-007-0071-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.340


  34 in total

1.  Localized squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus: retrospective analysis of three treatment schedules.

Authors:  C Delcambre; J H Jacob; D Pottier; M Gignoux; J M Ollivier; B Vie; A Roussel; P Segol
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for localized esophageal cancer.

Authors:  D P Kelsen; R Ginsberg; T F Pajak; D G Sheahan; L Gunderson; J Mortimer; N Estes; D G Haller; J Ajani; W Kocha; B D Minsky; J A Roth
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-31       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  H Koop
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus.

Authors:  A Herskovic; K Martz; M al-Sarraf; L Leichman; J Brindle; V Vaitkevicius; J Cooper; R Byhardt; L Davis; B Emami
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-06-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) consensus guidelines for brachytherapy of esophageal cancer. Clinical Research Committee, American Brachytherapy Society, Philadelphia, PA.

Authors:  L E Gaspar; S Nag; A Herskovic; R Mantravadi; B Speiser
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Phase II evaluation of preoperative chemoradiation and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  E I Heath; B A Burtness; R F Heitmiller; R Salem; L Kleinberg; J P Knisely; S C Yang; M A Talamini; H S Kaufman; M I Canto; M Topazian; T T Wu; K Olukayode; A A Forastiere
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Multi-institutional randomized trial of external radiotherapy with and without intraluminal brachytherapy for esophageal cancer in Japan. Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (JASTRO) Study Group.

Authors:  T Okawa; T Dokiya; M Nishio; Y Hishikawa; K Morita
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost following concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  A Yorozu; T Dokiya; Y Oki
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Systematic overview of preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemoradiotherapy trials in oesophageal cancer: evidence of a radiation and chemotherapy dose response.

Authors:  J Ian Geh; Simon J Bond; Søren M Bentzen; Robert Glynne-Jones
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 10.  Oesophogeal squamous cell carcinoms: II. A critical view of radiotherapy.

Authors:  R Earlam; J R Cunha-Melo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  2 in total

1.  Recommendations of the Spanish Brachytherapy Group of SEOR for HDR endoluminal treatments. Part 1: Oesophagus.

Authors:  Á Rovirosa; J Anchuelo; V Crispin; C Gutiérrez; A Herreros; I Herruzo; J C Menéndez; P Pino; A Polo; S Rodríguez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Why is a very easy, useful, old technique underused? An overview of esophageal brachytherapy - interventional radiotherapy.

Authors:  Albert Biete; György Kovács; Ángeles Rovirosa; Luca Tagliaferri; Adam Chicheł; Valentina Lancellotta; Yaowen Zhang; Gabriela Antelo; Peter Hoskin; Elzbieta Van Der Steen-Banasik
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2022-06-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.