Literature DB >> 12006449

Safety of pressure-volume curve measurement in acute lung injury and ARDS using a syringe technique.

Warren L Lee1, Thomas E Stewart, Rod MacDonald, Stephen Lapinsky, David Banayan, David Hallett, Sangeeta Mehta.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety of frequent pressure-volume (PV) curve measurement in patients with acute lung injury (ALI)/ARDS.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: Academic medical-surgical critical care unit. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with ALI or ARDS.
INTERVENTIONS: Static inspiratory PV curves of the respiratory system were determined twice on day 1, then once daily for up to 6 days using a syringe. At each time point, three separate measurements of the PV curve were made. A 100-mL graduated syringe was used to inflate patients' lungs with 50- to 100-mL increments up to an airway pressure of 45 cm H(2)O or a total volume of 2 L; each volume step was maintained for 2 to 3 s until a plateau airway pressure was recorded. Outcome measures were mean arterial BP, heart rate (HR), and oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO(2)) prior to and immediately after PV curve measurement. There were a priori criteria for procedure discontinuation if poorly tolerated. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Eleven patients were enrolled with a total of 134 PV curves generated. SpO(2) was 93 +/- 4% (mean +/- SD) before and fell to a nadir of 89 +/- 5% during PV curve measurement (p < 0.001), but increased to 97 +/- 4% immediately afterwards (p < 0.001, before vs after). HR rose from 106 +/- 22 to 108 +/- 22 beats/min immediately after the maneuver (p < 0.001). Mean arterial BP was 93 +/- 15 mm Hg before and 100 +/- 17 mm Hg immediately afterwards (p < 0.001). During PV curve measurement, systolic BP in one patient fell to 64 mm Hg from 113 mm Hg; in another patient, SpO(2) dropped to 79% from 89%. Both changes were transient. The study was discontinued in one patient because of inability to tolerate zero positive end-expiratory pressure; in another patient, the study was discontinued because of the development of subcutaneous emphysema.
CONCLUSIONS: PV curve measurement by syringe technique is well tolerated in most patients. Nonetheless, the maneuver may cause significant changes in oxygenation and/or hemodynamics, necessitating close monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12006449     DOI: 10.1378/chest.121.5.1595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  5 in total

1.  Repeated generation of the pulmonary pressure-volume curve may lead to derecruitment in experimental lung injury.

Authors:  Dietrich Henzler; Andreas Mahnken; Rolf Dembinski; Britta Waskowiak; Rolf Rossaint; Ralf Kuhlen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Static pressure volume curves and body posture in acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Spyros D Mentzelopoulos; Charis Roussos; Spyros G Zakynthinos
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Clinical experience with Smart Care after off-pump coronary artery bypass for early extubation.

Authors:  Go Kataoka; Noriyuki Murai; Kojiro Kodera; Akihito Sasaki; Ryota Asano; Masahiro Ikeda; Akiko Yamaguchi; Yasuo Takeuchi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 4.  Clinical review: respiratory mechanics in spontaneous and assisted ventilation.

Authors:  Daniel C Grinnan; Jonathon Dean Truwit
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-04-18       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Generation of a single pulmonary pressure-volume curve does not durably affect oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Antoine Roch; Jean-Marie Forel; Didier Demory; Jean-Michel Arnal; Stéphane Donati; Marc Gainnier; Laurent Papazian
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.