Literature DB >> 12004696

Pain perception and utility: a comparison of the syringe and computerized local injection techniques.

J W Nicholson1, T G Berry, J B Summitt, C H Yuan, T M Witten.   

Abstract

Thirty patients received maxillary infiltration and mandibular inferior alveolar nerve block injections with both a traditional syringe and a computerized system, the Wand. Patients noted their preference for either system and rated their injection pain and postoperative discomfort on a ten-point scale for each type of injection. Mean injection discomfort ratings with the Wand were lower than with the syringe but were not statistically significant. Reduced postoperative discomfort using the Wand for the inferior alveolar nerve block was significant. Both of the dentists in the study and those patients who stated a preference favored the Wand system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12004696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Dent        ISSN: 0363-6771


  15 in total

1.  Anesthetic efficacy of the anterior middle superior alveolar (AMSA) injection.

Authors:  Shelly Lee; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck; Joel Weaver
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2004

2.  The effects of a 2-stage injection technique on inferior alveolar nerve block injection pain.

Authors:  John Nusstein; Geoffrey Steinkruger; Al Reader; Mike Beck; Joel Weaver
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2006

3.  Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Injection Pain Using a Computer-Controlled Local Anesthetic Device (CCLAD): A Prospective, Randomized Study.

Authors:  Sara Fowler; Chase Crowley; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2018

4.  Single tooth anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia: a cross-over study.

Authors:  Vincenzo Campanella; Antonio Libonati; Roberto Nardi; Vincenzo Angotti; Gianni Gallusi; Edoardo Montemurro; Maurizio D'Amario; Giuseppe Marzo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Efficacy and safety of intraseptal and periodontal ligament anesthesia achieved by computer-controlled articaine + epinephrine delivery: a dose-finding study.

Authors:  Vladimir Biocanin; Bozidar Brkovic; Biljana Milicic; Dragica Stojic
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  "Comparative study of conventional anesthesia technique versus computerized system anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial".

Authors:  S Berrendero; O Hriptulova; M P Salido; F Martínez-Rus; G Pradíes
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Effectiveness of computer-assisted anesthetic delivery system (sta) in dental implant surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  F R Grassi; B Rapone; F Scarano Catanzaro; M Corsalini; Z Kalemaj
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-01-21

8.  Pain and efficacy rating of a microprocessor-controlled metered injection system for local anaesthesia in minor hand surgery.

Authors:  André S Nimigan; Bing Siang Gan
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2011-05-25

Review 9.  Advances in dental local anesthesia techniques and devices: An update.

Authors:  Payal Saxena; Saurabh K Gupta; Vilas Newaskar; Anil Chandra
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-01

10.  Comparison of the pain levels of computer-controlled and conventional anesthesia techniques in prosthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Murat Yenisey
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.