Literature DB >> 23382659

Rigid Body Energy Minimization on Manifolds for Molecular Docking.

Hanieh Mirzaei1, Dmitri Beglov, Ioannis Ch Paschalidis, Sandor Vajda, Pirooz Vakili, Dima Kozakov.   

Abstract

Virtually all docking methods include some local continuous minimization of an energy/scoring function in order to remove steric clashes and obtain more reliable energy values. In this paper, we describe an efficient rigid-body optimization algorithm that, compared to the most widely used algorithms, converges approximately an order of magnitude faster to conformations with equal or slightly lower energy. The space of rigid body transformations is a nonlinear manifold, namely, a space which locally resembles a Euclidean space. We use a canonical parametrization of the manifold, called the exponential parametrization, to map the Euclidean tangent space of the manifold onto the manifold itself. Thus, we locally transform the rigid body optimization to an optimization over a Euclidean space where basic optimization algorithms are applicable. Compared to commonly used methods, this formulation substantially reduces the dimension of the search space. As a result, it requires far fewer costly function and gradient evaluations and leads to a more efficient algorithm. We have selected the LBFGS quasi-Newton method for local optimization since it uses only gradient information to obtain second order information about the energy function and avoids the far more costly direct Hessian evaluations. Two applications, one in protein-protein docking, and the other in protein-small molecular interactions, as part of macromolecular docking protocols are presented. The code is available to the community under open source license, and with minimal effort can be incorporated into any molecular modeling package.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23382659      PMCID: PMC3561712          DOI: 10.1021/ct300272j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  19 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes.

Authors:  Stephen R Comeau; David W Gatchell; Sandor Vajda; Carlos J Camacho
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm.

Authors:  Rong Chen; Li Li; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-07-01

4.  Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Gray; Stewart Moughon; Chu Wang; Ora Schueler-Furman; Brian Kuhlman; Carol A Rohl; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques.

Authors:  E Katchalski-Katzir; I Shariv; M Eisenstein; A A Friesem; C Aflalo; I A Vakser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go.

Authors:  N Moitessier; P Englebienne; D Lee; J Lawandi; C R Corbeil
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 7.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  DARS (Decoys As the Reference State) potentials for protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Gwo-Yu Chuang; Dima Kozakov; Ryan Brenke; Stephen R Comeau; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 9.  Challenges and advances in computational docking: 2009 in review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Yuriev; Mark Agostino; Paul A Ramsland
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.137

Review 10.  Group theory and biomolecular conformation: I. Mathematical and computational models.

Authors:  Gregory S Chirikjian
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 2.333

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Modeling protein association mechanisms and kinetics.

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou; Paul A Bates
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  Energy Minimization on Manifolds for Docking Flexible Molecules.

Authors:  Hanieh Mirzaei; Shahrooz Zarbafian; Elizabeth Villar; Scott Mottarella; Dmitri Beglov; Sandor Vajda; Ioannis Ch Paschalidis; Pirooz Vakili; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  A New Distributed Algorithm for Side-Chain Positioning in the Process of Protein Docking*

Authors:  Mohammad Moghadasi; Dima Kozakov; Pirooz Vakili; Sandor Vajda; Ioannis Ch Paschalidis
Journal:  Proc IEEE Conf Decis Control       Date:  2013

4.  Monte Carlo on the manifold and MD refinement for binding pose prediction of protein-ligand complexes: 2017 D3R Grand Challenge.

Authors:  Mikhail Ignatov; Cong Liu; Andrey Alekseenko; Zhuyezi Sun; Dzmitry Padhorny; Sergei Kotelnikov; Andrey Kazennov; Ivan Grebenkin; Yaroslav Kholodov; Istvan Kolosvari; Alberto Perez; Ken Dill; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Sampling and refinement protocols for template-based macrocycle docking: 2018 D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Authors:  Sergei Kotelnikov; Andrey Alekseenko; Cong Liu; Mikhail Ignatov; Dzmitry Padhorny; Emiliano Brini; Mark Lukin; Evangelos Coutsias; Ken A Dill; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  The impact of side-chain packing on protein docking refinement.

Authors:  Mohammad Moghadasi; Hanieh Mirzaei; Artem Mamonov; Pirooz Vakili; Sandor Vajda; Ioannis Ch Paschalidis; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Optimization on the space of rigid and flexible motions: an alternative manifold optimization approach.

Authors:  Pirooz Vakili; Hanieh Mirzaei; Shahrooz Zarbafian; Ioannis Ch Paschalidis; Dima Kozakov; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Proc IEEE Conf Decis Control       Date:  2014-12

8.  A Subspace Semi-Definite programming-based Underestimation (SSDU) method for stochastic global optimization in protein docking.

Authors:  Feng Nan; Mohammad Moghadasi; Pirooz Vakili; Sandor Vajda; Dima Kozakov; Ioannis Ch Paschalidis
Journal:  Proc IEEE Conf Decis Control       Date:  2014-12

9.  Flexible Refinement of Protein-Ligand Docking on Manifolds.

Authors:  Hanieh Mirzaei; Elizabeth Villar; Scott Mottarella; Dmitri Beglov; Ioannis Ch Paschalidis; Sandor Vajda; Dima Kozakov; Pirooz Vakili
Journal:  Proc IEEE Conf Decis Control       Date:  2013

10.  Simulated unbound structures for benchmarking of protein docking in the DOCKGROUND resource.

Authors:  Tatsiana Kirys; Anatoly M Ruvinsky; Deepak Singla; Alexander V Tuzikov; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.