Literature DB >> 12000797

Hox gene control of segment-specific bristle patterns in Drosophila.

Marion Rozowski1, Michael Akam.   

Abstract

Hox genes specify the different morphologies of segments along the anteroposterior axis of animals. How they control complex segment morphologies is not well understood. We have studied how the Hox gene Ultrabithorax (Ubx) controls specific differences between the bristle patterns of the second and third thoracic segments (T2 and T3) of Drosophila melanogaster. We find that Ubx blocks the development of two particular bristles on T3 at different points in sensory organ development. For the apical bristle, a precursor is singled out and undergoes a first division in both the second and third legs, but in the third leg further differentiation of the second-order precursors is blocked. For the posterior sternopleural bristle, development on T3 ceases after proneural cluster initiation. Analysis of the temporal requirement for Ubx shows that in both cases Ubx function is required shortly before bristle development is blocked. We suggest that interactions between Ubx and the bristle patterning hierarchy have evolved independently on many occasions, affecting different molecular steps. The effects of Ubx on bristle development are highly dependent on the context of other patterning information. Suppression of bristle development or changes in bristle morphology in response to endogenous and ectopic Ubx expression are limited to bristles at specific locations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12000797      PMCID: PMC186253          DOI: 10.1101/gad.219302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  40 in total

1.  DER signaling restricts the boundaries of the wing field during Drosophila development.

Authors:  A Baonza; F Roch; E Martin-Blanco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A deficiency of the homeotic complex of the beetle Tribolium.

Authors:  J J Stuart; S J Brown; R W Beeman; R E Denell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Genetic mosaic analysis of decapentaplegic and wingless gene function in the Drosophila leg.

Authors:  L I Held; M A Heup
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 0.900

4.  Compartments and the topography of leg afferent projections in Drosophila.

Authors:  R K Murphey; D R Possidente; P Vandervorst; A Ghysen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The FLP recombinase of yeast catalyzes site-specific recombination in the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  K G Golic; S Lindquist
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-11-03       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  The gene poxn controls different steps of the formation of chemosensory organs in Drosophila.

Authors:  E Nottebohm; A Usui; S Therianos; K Kimura; C Dambly-Chaudière; A Ghysen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Ultrabithorax and the control of cell morphology in Drosophila halteres.

Authors:  F Roch; M Akam
Journal:  Development       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Dual functions of wingless in the Drosophila leg imaginal disc.

Authors:  E L Wilder; N Perrimon
Journal:  Development       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Generation of multiple antagonistic domains along the proximodistal axis during Drosophila leg development.

Authors:  M Abu-Shaar; R S Mann
Journal:  Development       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Specification of the embryonic limb primordium by graded activity of Decapentaplegic.

Authors:  S Goto; S Hayashi
Journal:  Development       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  15 in total

1.  Segment-specific regulation of the Drosophila AP-2 gene during leg and antennal development.

Authors:  Youngwook Ahn; Jizhong Zou; Pamela J Mitchell
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  Ubx promotes corbicular development in Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Victor Medved; Zachary Y Huang; Aleksandar Popadic
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  A Distalless-responsive enhancer of the Hox gene Sex combs reduced is required for segment- and sex-specific sensory organ development in Drosophila.

Authors:  Sebnem Ece Eksi; Olga Barmina; Christopher L McCallough; Artyom Kopp; Teresa Vales Orenic
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  Michael Akam and the rise of evolutionary developmental biology.

Authors:  David L Stern; Rachel E Dawes-Hoang
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.203

5.  Hox targets and cellular functions.

Authors:  Ernesto Sánchez-Herrero
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2013-12-30

Review 6.  Stage-specific control of stem cell niche architecture in the Drosophila testis by the posterior Hox gene Abd-B.

Authors:  Fani Papagiannouli; Ingrid Lohmann
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 7.271

7.  Evolution of a novel appendage ground plan in water striders is driven by changes in the Hox gene Ultrabithorax.

Authors:  Abderrahman Khila; Ehab Abouheif; Locke Rowe
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Hox gene expression leads to differential hind leg development between honeybee castes.

Authors:  Ana Durvalina Bomtorin; Angel Roberto Barchuk; Livia Maria Moda; Zila Luz Paulino Simoes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Hox go omics: insights from Drosophila into Hox gene targets.

Authors:  Anastasios Pavlopoulos; Michael Akam
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Ubx regulates differential enlargement and diversification of insect hind legs.

Authors:  Najmus Mahfooz; Nataliya Turchyn; Michelle Mihajlovic; Steven Hrycaj; Aleksandar Popadić
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.