Literature DB >> 11999959

Monochromatic aberrations provide an odd-error cue to focus direction.

Brent J Wilson1, Keith E Decker, Austin Roorda.   

Abstract

Monochromatic aberrations that exist in the human eye will cause differences in the appearance of the point-spread function (PSF) depending on whether there is positive or negative defocus. We establish whether it is possible to use these differences in the PSF to distinguish the direction of defocus. The monochromatic aberrations of eight subjects were measured with a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor. Subjects also performed a forced-choice psychophysical task in which they decided whether a blurred target was defocused in front of or behind the retina. The optical system for the psychophysical task was designed to isolate the blur due to monochromatic aberrations as the only odd-error cue to the direction of defocus. Shack-Hartmann measurements showed that monochromatic aberrations increase as the pupil size increases. On average, the correct/incorrect responses for discriminating differences in the PSF for different directions of defocus were 54/46 for a 1-mm pupil and 83/17 for a 5-mm pupil, representing more than an eight-fold increase in discriminability. This discriminability extended for large amounts of defocus and also for more complex targets, such as letters. Sensitivity to the differences in the PSF for different directions of defocus increased as monochromatic aberrations increased, particularly for the even-order aberrations, which give rise to an odd-error focus cue. It was found that the ability to discriminate PSFs for different directions of defocus varied among individuals but, in general, depended on the magnitude of monochromatic aberrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11999959     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.19.000833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  32 in total

1.  Optimal defocus estimation in individual natural images.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Monochromatic ocular wave aberrations in young monkeys.

Authors:  Ramkumar Ramamirtham; Chea-su Kee; Li-Fang Hung; Ying Qiao-Grider; Austin Roorda; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Visual accommodation in vertebrates: mechanisms, physiological response and stimuli.

Authors:  Matthias Ott
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Aberrations of chick eyes during normal growth and lens induction of myopia.

Authors:  Marsha L Kisilak; Melanie C W Campbell; Jennifer J Hunter; Elizabeth L Irving; Lan Huang
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  [Monochromatic aberration in accommodation. Dynamic wavefront analysis].

Authors:  M Fritzsch; J Dawczynski; S Jurkutat; R Vollandt; J Strobel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  The impact of higher-order aberrations on the strength of directional signals produced by accommodative microfluctuations.

Authors:  Sangeetha Metlapally; Jianliang L Tong; Humza J Tahir; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Two-photon microperimetry with picosecond pulses.

Authors:  Marcin J Marzejon; Łukasz Kornaszewski; Jakub Bogusławski; Piotr Ciąćka; Miłosz Martynow; Grażyna Palczewska; Sebastian Maćkowski; Krzysztof Palczewski; Maciej Wojtkowski; Katarzyna Komar
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Effect of even and odd-order aberrations on the accommodation response.

Authors:  Aikaterini I Moulakaki; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; José J Esteve-Taboada; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Creating correct blur and its effect on accommodation.

Authors:  Steven A Cholewiak; Gordon D Love; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Wave aberrations in rhesus monkeys with vision-induced ametropias.

Authors:  Ramkumar Ramamirtham; Chea-Su Kee; Li-Fang Hung; Ying Qiao-Grider; Juan Huang; Austin Roorda; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.