Literature DB >> 11999920

Decisions and revisions: the affective forecasting of changeable outcomes.

Daniel T Gilbert1, Jane E J Ebert.   

Abstract

People prefer to make changeable decisions rather than unchangeable decisions because they do not realize that they may be more satisfied with the latter. Photography students believed that having the opportunity to change their minds about which prints to keep would not influence their liking of the prints. However, those who had the opportunity to change their minds liked their prints less than those who did not (Study 1). Although the opportunity to change their minds impaired the postdecisional processes that normally promote satisfaction (Study 2a), most participants wanted to have that opportunity (Study 2b). The results demonstrate that errors in affective forecasting can lead people to behave in ways that do not optimize their happiness and well-being.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11999920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  28 in total

1.  The variability of patient preferences.

Authors:  Joseph Bernstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Affective forecasting and medication decision making in breast-cancer prevention.

Authors:  Michael Hoerger; Laura D Scherer; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  What we regret most... and why.

Authors:  Neal J Roese; Amy Summerville
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-09

4.  Dare to Compare: Fact-Based versus Simulation-Based Comparison in Daily Life.

Authors:  Amy Summerville; Neal J Roese
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-05

5.  Regret and Behavior: Comment on Zeelenberg and Pieters.

Authors:  Neal J Roese; Amy Summerville; Florian Fessel
Journal:  J Consum Psychol       Date:  2007-01

6.  Better, Stronger, Faster: Self-Serving Judgment, Affect Regulation, and the Optimal Vigilance Hypothesis.

Authors:  Neal J Roese; James M Olson
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-06

Review 7.  Why the brain talks to itself: sources of error in emotional prediction.

Authors:  Daniel T Gilbert; Timothy D Wilson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  The functional theory of counterfactual thinking.

Authors:  Kai Epstude; Neal J Roese
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-05

9.  An affective booster moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on behavioral intentions for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ferrer; William M P Klein; Laura E Zajac; Stephanie R Land; Bruce S Ling
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-08-18

10.  A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Uncertainty on Reproductive Behaviors.

Authors:  Jeff Davis; Daniel Werre
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2008-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.