Literature DB >> 11997893

TrueFISP: assessment of accuracy for measurement of left ventricular mass in an animal model.

David S Fieno1, Wyatt C Jaffe, Orlando P Simonetti, Robert M Judd, J Paul Finn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the accuracy of a high performance true fast imaging with steady-state precession (TrueFISP) pulse sequence for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) mass in a large animal model on 1.5-T scanners.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We imaged dogs (N = 10) on a clinical 1.5-T clinical scanner using electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated TrueFISP. In all animals, contiguous segmented k-space cine images were acquired from base to apex (in-plane resolution 1 x 1 mm(2), slice thickness 5 mm, TR = 4.8 msec, TE = 1.6 msec) during repeated breath-holds. In nine of the 10 animals, single-shot images gated to end-diastole were also acquired from base to apex in a single breath-hold (in-plane resolution 1 x 1 mm(2), slice thickness 5 mm, TR = 3.2 msec, TE = 1.6 msec). After imaging, animals were killed, the left ventricle was isolated, and the true mass of the left ventricle (free wall and septum) was determined. Independently, two observers blinded to the post-mortem results computed LV masses based on analysis of the magnetic resonance (MR) images.
RESULTS: Comparison of the computed LV mass using TrueFISP to the actual mass showed excellent agreement. Cine-systole was the most accurate technique (mass = 98.6% +/- 4.5% actual, bias = 1.2 +/- 3.4 g) followed by cine-diastole (mass = 97.9% +/- 5.3% actual, bias = 1.8 +/- 4.1 g) and single shot (mass = 94.7% +/- 7.9% actual, bias = 4.2 +/- 6.3 g). Inter- and intra-observer variabilities were low (5.8% +/- 7.1% and 0.4% +/- 4.8%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: We conclude that TrueFISP imaging is an accurate, rapid method to determine ventricular mass. In single-shot mode, TrueFISP requires only one breath-hold to estimate the mass of the heart within 6% of the actual value, whereas the segmented k-space implementation measured LV mass to within 3% of the true value. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11997893     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  28 in total

1.  Dual breath-hold magnetic resonance cine evaluation of global and regional cardiac function.

Authors:  Bernd J Wintersperger; Spencer Sincleair; Val M Runge; Olaf Dietrich; Armin Huber; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques.

Authors:  C Kupfahl; M Honold; G Meinhardt; H Vogelsberg; A Wagner; H Mahrholdt; U Sechtem
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Assessment of ventricular function and mass by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Khaled Alfakih; Scott Reid; Tim Jones; Mohan Sivananthan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  The reproducibility of left ventricular volume and mass measurements: a comparison between dual-inversion-recovery black-blood sequence and SSFP.

Authors:  Sarah Clay; Khaled Alfakih; Daniel R Messroghli; Timothy Jones; John P Ridgway; Mohan U Sivananthan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Non-invasive cardiac evaluation in heart failure patients using magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Stephanie M Shors; William G Cotts; Biljana Pavlovic-Surjancev; Mihai Gheorghiade; James C Carr; Richard M McCarthy; Scott F Pereles; Paul J Finn
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.214

6.  Guiding automated left ventricular chamber segmentation in cardiac imaging using the concept of conserved myocardial volume.

Authors:  Christopher D Garson; Bing Li; Scott T Acton; John A Hossack
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  Effects of daily hemodialysis on heart rate variability: results from the Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) Daily Trial.

Authors:  Christopher T Chan; Glenn M Chertow; John T Daugirdas; Tom H Greene; Peter Kotanko; Brett Larive; Andreas Pierratos; John B Stokes
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 5.992

8.  The effects of frequent hemodialysis on left ventricular mass, volumes, and geometry.

Authors:  Rakesh K Mishra; Ruth F Dubin
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Changes in Biomarker Profile and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Regression: Results from the Frequent Hemodialysis Network Trials.

Authors:  Christopher T Chan; George A Kaysen; Gerald J Beck; Minwei Li; Joan Lo; Michael V Rocco; Alan S Kliger
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.754

10.  CMR reference values for left ventricular volumes, mass, and ejection fraction using computer-aided analysis: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Michael L Chuang; Philimon Gona; Gilion L T F Hautvast; Carol J Salton; Marcel Breeuwer; Christopher J O'Donnell; Warren J Manning
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.