PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of abnormal magnetic resonance (MR) findings in the paraspinal muscles as indirect signs of nerve-root avulsion injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three consecutive patients suspected of having unilateral root-avulsion injury underwent MR imaging and were evaluated. Paraspinal muscles were evaluated for abnormal signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images, abnormal enhancement on images obtained after contrast material enhancement, and muscle volume loss. MR images were interpreted independently by two observers for interobserver variability. MR findings were compared with findings of root continuity, determined with a combination of surgery and clinical evaluation. Sensitivities, specificities, and kappa values of the findings were calculated. RESULTS: Sensitivities of MR findings in the paraspinal muscles indicating root-avulsion injury were 88% (36 of 41 patients) for abnormal enhancement, 83% (34 of 41 patients) for high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, 37% (15 of 41 patients) for high signal intensity on T1-weighted images, and 71% (29 of 41 patients) for muscle volume loss. Specificities for all findings were 100% (two of two patients). Of the paraspinal muscles, findings in the multifidus muscle were the most accurate and provided the highest interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.81). CONCLUSION: Contrast material-enhanced abnormal MR findings in the paraspinal muscles are accurate in indicating root-avulsion injuries, and abnormal enhancement in the multifidus muscle is the most accurate among paraspinal muscle findings. Copyright RSNA, 2002
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of abnormal magnetic resonance (MR) findings in the paraspinal muscles as indirect signs of nerve-root avulsion injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three consecutive patients suspected of having unilateral root-avulsion injury underwent MR imaging and were evaluated. Paraspinal muscles were evaluated for abnormal signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images, abnormal enhancement on images obtained after contrast material enhancement, and muscle volume loss. MR images were interpreted independently by two observers for interobserver variability. MR findings were compared with findings of root continuity, determined with a combination of surgery and clinical evaluation. Sensitivities, specificities, and kappa values of the findings were calculated. RESULTS: Sensitivities of MR findings in the paraspinal muscles indicating root-avulsion injury were 88% (36 of 41 patients) for abnormal enhancement, 83% (34 of 41 patients) for high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, 37% (15 of 41 patients) for high signal intensity on T1-weighted images, and 71% (29 of 41 patients) for muscle volume loss. Specificities for all findings were 100% (two of two patients). Of the paraspinal muscles, findings in the multifidus muscle were the most accurate and provided the highest interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.81). CONCLUSION: Contrast material-enhanced abnormal MR findings in the paraspinal muscles are accurate in indicating root-avulsion injuries, and abnormal enhancement in the multifidus muscle is the most accurate among paraspinal muscle findings. Copyright RSNA, 2002
Authors: Yussef Ali Abdouni; João Pedro Farina Brunelli; Ramiro Joaquim de Carvalho Neto; Karina Todeschini; Antônio Carlos da Costa Journal: Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) Date: 2021-11-04