Literature DB >> 11993062

Outcomes of subatmospheric pressure dressing therapy on wounds of the diabetic foot.

David G Armstrong1, Lawrence A Lavery, Patricia Abu-Rumman, Eric H Espensen, Jefferey R Vazquez, Brent P Nixon, Andrew J M Boulton.   

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate outcomes of people with large diabetic foot wounds treated with subatmospheric pressure dressing therapy immediately following surgical wound debridement. Data were abstracted from the medical records of 31 consecutive patients with diabetes, 77.4% male (n = 24), aged 56.1 +/- 11.7 years, presenting for care at two large multidisciplinary wound care centers. All patients received surgical debridement for indolent diabetic foot wounds and were subsequently started on a regimen of subatmospheric pressure dressing therapy delivered using a vacuum-assisted closure device for a mean of 4.7 +/- 4.2 weeks (mode = 2 weeks) using a protocol that called for cessation of therapy when the wound bed approached 100% coverage with granulation tissue with no exposed tendon, joint capsule, or bone. Outcomes evaluated included time to complete wound closure, proportion of patients achieving wound healing at the level of initial debridement, and complications associated with use of the device. The mean duration of wounds before therapy was 25.4 +/- 23.8 weeks. In patients treated with subatmospheric pressure dressing therapy, 90.3% (n = 28) of wounds healed at the level of debridement without the need for further bony resection in a mean 8.1 +/- 5.5 weeks. The remaining 9.7% (n = 3) went on to higher level amputation (below knee amputation = 3.2%, [n = 1] and transmetatarsal amputation = 6.5% [n = 2]). Complications included periwound maceration (19.4% [n = 6]), periwound cellulitis (3.2% [n = 1]), and deep space infection (3.2% [n = 1]). The authors concluded that appropriate use of subatmospheric pressure dressing therapy to achieve a rapid granular bed in diabetic foot wounds may have promise in treatment of this population at high risk for amputation and that a large, randomized trial is now indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11993062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage        ISSN: 0889-5899            Impact factor:   2.629


  22 in total

Review 1.  Healing the diabetic wound and keeping it healed: modalities for the early 21st century.

Authors:  Matthew J Claxton; David G Armstrong; Andrew J M Boulton
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  [The present state of vacuum sealing].

Authors:  J Tautenhahn; T Bürger; H Lippert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Use of negative pressure wound therapy to help facilitate limb preservation.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; George Andros
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Topical negative pressure therapy: mechanisms and indications.

Authors:  Paul E Banwell; Melinda Musgrave
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  [Benefits and limitations of vacuum therapy in wounds].

Authors:  M Augustin; K Herberger
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 0.751

6.  Negative pressure wound therapy as an adjunct in healing of chronic wounds.

Authors:  Vijay Langer; Prem S Bhandari; Satyamoorthy Rajagopalan; Mrinal K Mukherjee
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  A clinical review of infected wound treatment with Vacuum Assisted Closure (V.A.C.) therapy: experience and case series.

Authors:  Allen Gabriel; Jaimie Shores; Brent Bernstein; Jean de Leon; Ravi Kamepalli; Tom Wolvos; Mona M Baharestani; Subhas Gupta
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  VAC therapy to promote wound healing after surgical revascularisation for critical lower limb ischaemia.

Authors:  Giovanni De Caridi; Mafalda Massara; Michele Greco; Narayana Pipitò; Francesco Spinelli; Raffaele Grande; Lucia Butrico; Stefano de Franciscis; Raffaele Serra
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  The 'Two Bridges Technique' for sternal wound closure. The use of vacuum-assisted closure for the treatment of deep sternal wound defects: a centre-specific technique.

Authors:  Karl Waked; Philippe Ballaux; Dominique Goossens; Koen Cathenis
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 10.  Optimising antimicrobial therapy in diabetic foot infections.

Authors:  Nalini Rao; Benjamin A Lipsky
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.