Hans E Grossniklaus1. 1. Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: ophtheg@emory.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To review the progress made in understanding the genetic basis, molecular pathology, and treatment of retinoblastoma since the previous Jackson lecture on the topic was published 50 years ago. DESIGN: Perspective based on personal experience and the literature. METHODS: The literature regarding retinoblastoma was reviewed since 1963. Advances in understanding the biology and treatment of retinoblastoma provided context through the author's clinical, pathologic, and research experiences. RESULTS: Retinoblastoma was first identified in the 1500s and defined as a unique clinicopathologic entity in 1809. Until the mid-1900s, knowledge advanced sporadically, with technological developments of ophthalmoscopy and light microscopy, and with the introduction of surgical enucleation, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. During the last 50 years, research and treatment have progressed at an unprecedented rate owing to innovations in molecular biology and the development of targeted therapies. During this time period, the retinoblastoma gene was discovered; techniques for genetic testing for retinoblastoma were developed; and plaque brachytherapy, chemoreduction, intra-arterial chemotherapy, and intraocular injections of chemotherapeutic agents were successfully introduced. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all patients with retinoblastoma in developed countries can now be cured of their primary cancer--a remarkable achievement for a childhood cancer that once was uniformly fatal. Much of this success is owed to deciphering the role of the Rb gene, and the benefits of targeted therapies, such as chemoreduction with consolidation as well as intra-arterial and intravitreal chemotherapies. Going forward, the main challenge will be ensuring that access to care is available for all children, particularly those in developing countries.
PURPOSE: To review the progress made in understanding the genetic basis, molecular pathology, and treatment of retinoblastoma since the previous Jackson lecture on the topic was published 50 years ago. DESIGN: Perspective based on personal experience and the literature. METHODS: The literature regarding retinoblastoma was reviewed since 1963. Advances in understanding the biology and treatment of retinoblastoma provided context through the author's clinical, pathologic, and research experiences. RESULTS:Retinoblastoma was first identified in the 1500s and defined as a unique clinicopathologic entity in 1809. Until the mid-1900s, knowledge advanced sporadically, with technological developments of ophthalmoscopy and light microscopy, and with the introduction of surgical enucleation, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. During the last 50 years, research and treatment have progressed at an unprecedented rate owing to innovations in molecular biology and the development of targeted therapies. During this time period, the retinoblastoma gene was discovered; techniques for genetic testing for retinoblastoma were developed; and plaque brachytherapy, chemoreduction, intra-arterial chemotherapy, and intraocular injections of chemotherapeutic agents were successfully introduced. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all patients with retinoblastoma in developed countries can now be cured of their primary cancer--a remarkable achievement for a childhood cancer that once was uniformly fatal. Much of this success is owed to deciphering the role of the Rb gene, and the benefits of targeted therapies, such as chemoreduction with consolidation as well as intra-arterial and intravitreal chemotherapies. Going forward, the main challenge will be ensuring that access to care is available for all children, particularly those in developing countries.
Authors: David H Abramson; Brian P Marr; Scott E Brodie; Ira Dunkel; Sotiria Palioura; Y Pierre Gobin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rose Duminuco; Jake W Noble; Joseph Goody; Manju Sharma; Bruce R Ksander; Calvin D Roskelley; Michael E Cox; Julia Mills Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2015 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Simon Ammanuel; Matthew D Alexander; Bertil Damato; Daniel L Cooke; Van V Halbach; Matthew R Amans; Christopher F Dowd; Randall T Higashida; Steven W Hetts Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Pia R Mendoza; Charles S Specht; G Baker Hubbard; Jill R Wells; Michael J Lynn; Qing Zhang; Jun Kong; Hans E Grossniklaus Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Lauren E Hudson; Pia Mendoza; William H Hudson; Alison Ziesel; G Baker Hubbard; Jill Wells; Bhakti Dwivedi; Jeanne Kowalski; Sandra Seby; Viren Patel; Eldon Geisert; Charles Specht; Hans E Grossniklaus Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2018-07-21 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Camila V Ventura; Audina M Berrocal; Jennifer Thomson; Fiona J Ehlies; Azeema Latiff; Timothy G Murray Journal: Int J Retina Vitreous Date: 2017-08-14
Authors: Daphne L Mourits; Dyonne T Hartong; Andries E Budding; Machteld I Bosscha; H Stevie Tan; Annette C Moll Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2017-03-01