Literature DB >> 11992366

Brush cytology of the biliary tract: retrospective study of 278 cases with histopathologic correlation.

Hema Govil1, Vijaya Reddy, Larry Kluskens, Diana Treaba, Razan Massarani-Wafai, Suzanne Selvaggi, Paolo Gattuso.   

Abstract

Bile aspiration during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography has been used as a diagnostic tool in the evaluations of pancreatic and biliary tree strictures for the last two decades. However, recently biliary tract brush cytology has become the method of choice in evaluating pancreatic/biliary tract abnormalities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of pancreatobiliary lesions by an endobiliary cytotechnique. From 1993-1999, 278 pancreatobiliary brushings were performed at our institutions. Cytologic material was air-dried for Diff-Quik stain or fixed in ethanol for Papanicolaou staining. The cytologic diagnoses were classified in three categories: 1) benign, 2) atypical/suspicious, or 3) malignant. Subsequent surgical biopsy was available in 87 (31%) patients. There were 150 males and 128 females with a mean age of 63 yr (range 22-97); 167 (60%) were benign cases. Follow-up surgical material was available in 39 cases, seven of which showed adenocarcinoma; 67 of all cases (24%) were atypical/suspicious cases. Follow-up surgical material was available in 31 cases, 17 (55%) of which showed adenocarcinoma; 32 cases (12%) were malignant cases. Follow-up surgical material was available in 15 cases. All 15 cases were in agreement with the cytologic diagnosis. Twelve (4%) cases were unsatisfactory for cytologic examination. Follow-up surgical material was available in two cases. One case showed mucinous cystadenoma of the pancreas. The other case showed benign duct epithelium. Our study shows a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 100%. Of the atypical cases, 55% were malignant on follow-up biopsy. Brush cytology of pancreatobiliary strictures is the most widely used technique in the diagnosis of carcinoma, with a high degree of specificity. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11992366     DOI: 10.1002/dc.10098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol        ISSN: 1097-0339            Impact factor:   1.582


  15 in total

Review 1.  Molecular diagnosis of pancreatobiliary malignancies in brush cytologies of biliary strictures.

Authors:  T M Gress
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Peroral cholangioscopy in the new millennium.

Authors:  Mansour A Parsi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumour of the Extrahepatic Bile Duct: a Case Report with Review of Literature.

Authors:  Mohamed Safwan; Mukul Vij; Sanjay Govil; Mohamed Rela
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2016-03

4.  Cytologic predictors of malignancy in bile duct brushings: a multi-reviewer analysis of 60 cases.

Authors:  Vaidehi Avadhani; Ezgi Hacihasanoglu; Bahar Memis; Burcin Pehlivanoglu; Krisztina Z Hanley; Uma Krishnamurti; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Lauren M Daniels; Alexa A Freedman; Michael Goodman; Volkan Adsay; Michelle D Reid
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Single operator choledochoscopy and its role in daily endoscopy routine.

Authors:  Arthur Hoffman; Johannes Wilhelm Rey; Ralf Kiesslich
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-05-16

6.  Differentiation of multiple types of pancreatico-biliary tumors by molecular analysis of clinical specimens.

Authors:  Thomas M Gress; Hans A Kestler; Ludwig Lausser; Lisa Fiedler; Bence Sipos; Christoph W Michalski; Jens Werner; Nathalia Giese; Aldo Scarpa; Malte Buchholz
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Comparison of KRAS mutation analysis and FISH for detecting pancreatobiliary tract cancer in cytology specimens collected during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Benjamin R Kipp; Emily G Barr Fritcher; Amy C Clayton; Gregory J Gores; Lewis R Roberts; Jun Zhang; Michael J Levy; Kevin C Halling
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 5.568

8.  Efficacy of SpyGlass(TM)-directed biopsy compared to brush cytology in obtaining adequate tissue for diagnosis in patients with biliary strictures.

Authors:  Johannes Wilhelm Rey; Torsten Hansen; Sebastian Dümcke; Achim Tresch; Katja Kramer; Peter Robert Galle; Martin Goetz; Marcus Schuchmann; Ralf Kiesslich; Arthur Hoffman
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-04-16

9.  The role of preoperative biopsy in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  D L Clarke; B A Clarke; S R Thomson; O J Garden; N G Lazarus
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  S100A4 mRNA is a diagnostic and prognostic marker in pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Naoki Ikenaga; Kenoki Ohuchida; Kazuhiro Mizumoto; Jun Yu; Hayato Fujita; Kohei Nakata; Junji Ueda; Norihiro Sato; Eishi Nagai; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.