Literature DB >> 28431275

Learning Non-rigid Deformations for Robust, Constrained Point-based Registration in Image-Guided MR-TRUS Prostate Intervention.

John A Onofrey1, Lawrence H Staib2, Saradwata Sarkar3, Rajesh Venkataraman4, Cayce B Nawaf5, Preston C Sprenkle6, Xenophon Papademetris7.   

Abstract

Accurate and robust non-rigid registration of pre-procedure magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to intra-procedure trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) is critical for image-guided biopsies of prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is one of the most prevalent forms of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men in the United States. TRUS-guided biopsy is the current clinical standard for prostate cancer diagnosis and assessment. State-of-the-art, clinical MR-TRUS image fusion relies upon semi-automated segmentations of the prostate in both the MR and the TRUS images to perform non-rigid surface-based registration of the gland. Segmentation of the prostate in TRUS imaging is itself a challenging task and prone to high variability. These segmentation errors can lead to poor registration and subsequently poor localization of biopsy targets, which may result in false-negative cancer detection. In this paper, we present a non-rigid surface registration approach to MR-TRUS fusion based on a statistical deformation model (SDM) of intra-procedural deformations derived from clinical training data. Synthetic validation experiments quantifying registration volume of interest overlaps of the PI-RADS parcellation standard and tests using clinical landmark data demonstrate that our use of an SDM for registration, with median target registration error of 2.98 mm, is significantly more accurate than the current clinical method. Furthermore, we show that the low-dimensional SDM registration results are robust to segmentation errors that are not uncommon in clinical TRUS data.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dimensionality reduction; Image-guided biopsy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Non-rigid registration; Prostate; Statistical deformation model; Trans-rectal ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28431275      PMCID: PMC5514316          DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2017.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  51 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Prostate boundary segmentation from 2D ultrasound images.

Authors:  H M Ladak; F Mao; Y Wang; D B Downey; D A Steinman; A Fenster
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Real time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Irving Kaplan; Nicklas E Oldenburg; Paul Meskell; Michael Blake; Paul Church; Edward J Holupka
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  A spline-based non-linear diffeomorphism for multimodal prostate registration.

Authors:  Jhimli Mitra; Zoltan Kato; Robert Martí; Arnau Oliver; Xavier Lladó; Désiré Sidibé; Soumya Ghose; Joan C Vilanova; Josep Comet; Fabrice Meriaudeau
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Registration of MR prostate images with biomechanical modeling and nonlinear parameter estimation.

Authors:  Ron Alterovitz; Ken Goldberg; Jean Pouliot; I-Chow Joe Hsu; Yongbok Kim; Susan Moyher Noworolski; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A robust point-matching algorithm for autoradiograph alignment.

Authors:  A Rangarajan; H Chui; E Mjolsness; S Pappu; L Davachi; P Goldman-Rakic; J Duncan
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Prostate multimodality image registration based on B-splines and quadrature local energy.

Authors:  Jhimli Mitra; Robert Martí; Arnau Oliver; Xavier Lladó; Soumya Ghose; Joan C Vilanova; Fabrice Meriaudeau
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Multiattribute probabilistic prostate elastic registration (MAPPER): application to fusion of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Rachel Sparks; B Nicolas Bloch; Ernest Feleppa; Dean Barratt; Daniel Moses; Lee Ponsky; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Low-Dimensional Non-Rigid Image Registration Using Statistical Deformation Models From Semi-Supervised Training Data.

Authors:  John A Onofrey; Xenophon Papademetris; Lawrence H Staib
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of Elastic and Rigid Registration during Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Multi-Operator Phantom Study.

Authors:  Graham R Hale; Marcin Czarniecki; Alexis Cheng; Jonathan B Bloom; Reza Seifabadi; Samuel A Gold; Kareem N Rayn; Vikram K Sabarwal; Sherif Mehralivand; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey; Brad Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Office-Based, Single-Sided, Low-Field MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Poorvi Satya; John Adams; Srirama S Venkataraman; Dinesh Kumar; Ram Narayanan; Aleksandar Nacev; Joseph N Macaluso
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-15

Review 3.  Accurate validation of ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer: a review of challenges in registration of imaging and histopathology.

Authors:  Rogier R Wildeboer; Ruud J G van Sloun; Arnoud W Postema; Christophe K Mannaerts; Maudy Gayet; Harrie P Beerlage; Hessel Wijkstra; Massimo Mischi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-07-30

Review 4.  Focal Salvage Treatment of Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review of Current Strategies and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Marieke van Son; Max Peters; Marinus Moerland; Linda Kerkmeijer; Jan Lagendijk; Jochem van der Voort van Zyp
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Impact of Surgeon's Experience in Rigid versus Elastic MRI/TRUS-Fusion Biopsy to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer Using Targeted and Systematic Cores.

Authors:  Magdalena Görtz; Joanne Nyaboe Nyarangi-Dix; Lars Pursche; Viktoria Schütz; Philipp Reimold; Constantin Schwab; Albrecht Stenzinger; Holger Sültmann; Stefan Duensing; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; David Bonekamp; Markus Hohenfellner; Jan Philipp Radtke
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Automatic segmentation of prostate MRI using convolutional neural networks: Investigating the impact of network architecture on the accuracy of volume measurement and MRI-ultrasound registration.

Authors:  Nooshin Ghavami; Yipeng Hu; Eli Gibson; Ester Bonmati; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore; Dean C Barratt
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Real-time multimodal image registration with partial intraoperative point-set data.

Authors:  Zachary M C Baum; Yipeng Hu; Dean C Barratt
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 8.545

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.