Literature DB >> 11992019

Automated assessment of conditioning parameters for context and cued fear in mice.

Angelo Contarino1, Leonardo Baca, Arthur Kennelly, Lisa H Gold.   

Abstract

A behavioral technique often used to evaluate the cognitive performance of rats and mice is the fear conditioning paradigm. During conditioned fear experiments, freezing responses shown by rodents after exposure to environmental stimuli previously paired to an aversive experience provide a behavioral index of the animal's associative abilities. The present study examined the ability of a computer-controlled automated Freeze Monitor system for recording immobility behavior in mice. The sensitivity of the automated procedure to detect group differences caused by the application of various training protocols was also evaluated. Statistical analyses revealed significant positive correlations between immobility scores obtained with the automated apparatus and hand-scored data collected by a continuous or a time-sampling method. Behavioral patterns recorded by the computerized system were very similar to those obtained by the hand-scoring methods adopted. In particular, during context testing, exposure to environmental stimuli previously paired with a mild foot shock (unconditioned stimulus [US]) evoked increased immobility behavior in mice conditioned with the US compared with levels of immobility displayed by mice previously confined to the same contextual stimuli without receiving the US. Moreover, although during conditioned stimulus (CS) testing, mice previously exposed to the US displayed high levels of immobility when confined to environmental cues much different from those paired with the US (contextual fear generalization), both hand-scored and automated results revealed the effect of CS-US pairing (increased immobility) only in mice trained to associate the two stimuli (paired group) but not in mice exposed to both CS and US separated by a 40-sec time interval (unpaired group) or in mice receiving only the US (US group) during conditioning sessions. Overall, the results show associative conditioning measured in an automated apparatus and highlight the utility of obtaining both latency as well as beam interruption parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11992019      PMCID: PMC155931          DOI: 10.1101/lm.43002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  21 in total

1.  Integration of molecular biological techniques and behavioural pharmacology.

Authors:  L.H. Gold
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Retraction of Ross and LoLordo findings concerning blocking in serial feature-positive discriminations.

Authors:  V M LoLordo; R T Ross
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1990-10

3.  Differential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning.

Authors:  R G Phillips; J E LeDoux
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Automated measurement of mouse freezing behavior and its use for quantitative trait locus analysis of contextual fear conditioning in (BALB/cJ x C57BL/6J)F2 mice.

Authors:  V S Valentinuzzi; D E Kolker; M H Vitaterna; K Shimomura; A Whiteley; S Low-Zeddies; F W Turek; E A Ferrari; R Paylor; J S Takahashi
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Hippocampal lesions cause learning deficits in inbred mice in the Morris water maze and conditioned-fear task.

Authors:  S F Logue; R Paylor; J M Wehner
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Effects of amygdala, hippocampus, and periaqueductal gray lesions on short- and long-term contextual fear.

Authors:  J J Kim; R A Rison; M S Fanselow
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Automated measurement of rearing behavior in adult and neonatal rats.

Authors:  P R Sanberg; T H Moran; K L Kubos; J T Coyle
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Assessment of learning by the Morris water task and fear conditioning in inbred mouse strains and F1 hybrids: implications of genetic background for single gene mutations and quantitative trait loci analyses.

Authors:  E H Owen; S F Logue; D L Rasmussen; J M Wehner
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 9.  Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: implications and recommendations for molecular studies.

Authors:  J N Crawley; J K Belknap; A Collins; J C Crabbe; W Frankel; N Henderson; R J Hitzemann; S C Maxson; L L Miner; A J Silva; J M Wehner; A Wynshaw-Boris; R Paylor
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Reduced hippocampal long-term potentiation and context-specific deficit in associative learning in mGluR1 mutant mice.

Authors:  A Aiba; C Chen; K Herrup; C Rosenmund; C F Stevens; S Tonegawa
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-10-21       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  9 in total

1.  Levels of neurotrophic factors in the hippocampus and amygdala correlate with anxiety- and fear-related behaviour in C57BL6 mice.

Authors:  B K Yee; S-W Zhu; A H Mohammed; J Feldon
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Specific downregulation of hippocampal ATF4 reveals a necessary role in synaptic plasticity and memory.

Authors:  Silvia Pasini; Carlo Corona; Jin Liu; Lloyd A Greene; Michael L Shelanski
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  Hypermorphic mutation of the voltage-gated sodium channel encoding gene Scn10a causes a dramatic stimulus-dependent neurobehavioral phenotype.

Authors:  Amanda L Blasius; Adrienne E Dubin; Matt J Petrus; Byung-Kwan Lim; Anna Narezkina; José R Criado; Derek N Wills; Yu Xia; Eva Marie Y Moresco; Cindy Ehlers; Kirk U Knowlton; Ardem Patapoutian; Bruce Beutler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Are Sema5a mutant mice a good model of autism? A behavioral analysis of sensory systems, emotionality and cognition.

Authors:  Rhian K Gunn; Matthew J Huentelman; Richard E Brown
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Genetic background differences and nonassociative effects in mouse trace fear conditioning.

Authors:  Dani R Smith; Michela Gallagher; Mark E Stanton
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Developing and validating trace fear conditioning protocols in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Michael A Burman; Cassandra A Simmons; Miles Hughes; Lei Lei
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Nmf9 Encodes a Highly Conserved Protein Important to Neurological Function in Mice and Flies.

Authors:  Shuxiao Zhang; Kevin D Ross; Glen A Seidner; Michael R Gorman; Tiffany H Poon; Xiaobo Wang; Elizabeth M Keithley; Patricia N Lee; Mark Q Martindale; William J Joiner; Bruce A Hamilton
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Contextual and cued fear conditioning test using a video analyzing system in mice.

Authors:  Hirotaka Shoji; Keizo Takao; Satoko Hattori; Tsuyoshi Miyakawa
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  An Automated Motion Detection and Reward System for Animal Training.

Authors:  Brad Miller; Audrey N Lim; Arnold F Heidbreder; Kevin J Black
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-12-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.