Literature DB >> 11984207

The metabolic demand of golf in patients with heart disease and in healthy adults.

Devon A Dobrosielski1, Peter H Brubaker, Michael J Berry, Makoto Ayabe, Henry S Miller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the metabolic cost of golf, while pulling a cart, in a group of patients with heart disease (HD) and healthy adults with a wide range of functional capacities.
METHODS: Twenty male golfers aged 49 to 78 years participated in this study. All participants underwent a graded exercise test (GXT) with expired gas analysis to determine functional capacity. Each patient with HD (n = 10) was matched with a healthy adult of similar age. Each pair completed 9 holes of golf while pulling a cart, during which oxygen consumption was monitored continuously via the Cosmed K4b2 portable unit.
RESULTS: The average metabolic equivalent (MET) value (1 MET = 3.5 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1)) (mean +/- SEM) for 9 holes of golf in this group of men with HD (4.1 +/- 0.1 METs) was similar to that previously reported value of 4.3 METs. Whereas the average MET responses were similar between the groups, when expressed relative to peak oxygen consumption, on average, patients with HD worked at a significantly higher percentage of their functional capacity (57 +/- 2.7%) compared to the healthy adults (46 +/- 2.6%). Some patients with HD exceeded 100% of GXT MET level during golf. In contrast, some healthy adults failed to reach 60% of GXT MET level during golf.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, walking the golf course while pulling a cart appears to provide an adequate training stimulus for most patients with HD. However, some lower fit patients with HD (< 8 METs) are in danger of exceeding a safe level and should be encouraged to monitor intensity on the golf course and consider using a motorized cart. For most individuals who are more fit (functional capacity > or = 8 METs), golf does not appear to provide the stimulus generally associated with improvement in functional capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11984207     DOI: 10.1097/00008483-200203000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil        ISSN: 0883-9212            Impact factor:   2.081


  8 in total

Review 1.  The role of physiology in the development of golf performance.

Authors:  Mark F Smith
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Golf and Physical Health: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Graeme G Sorbie; Alexander J Beaumont; Ashley K Williams; David Lavallee
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 11.928

Review 3.  Upper Body Injuries in Golfers.

Authors:  Andrew Creighton; Jennifer Cheng; Joel Press
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-08-05

Review 4.  Golf injuries: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Andrew McHardy; Henry Pollard; Kehui Luo
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  A rapid review to identify physical activity accrued while playing golf.

Authors:  Jack Luscombe; Andrew D Murray; Evan Jenkins; Daryll Archibald
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Associations between markers of health and playing golf in an Australian population.

Authors:  Brad Stenner; Amber D Mosewich; Jonathan D Buckley; Elizabeth S Buckley
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2019-04-12

Review 7.  The relationships between golf and health: a scoping review.

Authors:  A D Murray; L Daines; D Archibald; R A Hawkes; C Schiphorst; P Kelly; L Grant; N Mutrie
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 8.  Public health considerations regarding golf during the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review.

Authors:  Patrick Gordon Robinson; Charlie Foster; Andrew Murray
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2021-04-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.