Literature DB >> 11979577

Evaluation of four postprocessing methods for determination of cerebral blood volume and mean transit time by dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging.

Jussi Perkiö1, Hannu J Aronen, Aki Kangasmäki, Yawu Liu, Jari Karonen, Sauli Savolainen, Leif Østergaard.   

Abstract

Four different postprocessing methods to determine cerebral blood volume (CBV) and contrast agent mean transit time (MTT) by dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI were compared. CBV was determined by two different methods that integrate tracer concentration-time curves numerically and by two other methods that take recirculation into account. For the two methods that use numerical integration, one method cuts the integration after the first pass while the other method integrates over the whole time series. For the two methods that account for recirculation, one method uses a gamma-variate fit, whereas the other method utilizes tissue impulse response. All four methods determine MTT as the ratio of CBV and cerebral blood flow (CBF). In each case, CBF was obtained as the height of the impulse response obtained by deconvolving the tissue concentration-time curves with a noninvasively determined arterial input function. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine the reliability of the methods and the validity of the simulations was supported by observation of similar trends in 13 acute stroke patients. The method of determining CBV and subsequently MTT was found to affect the measured value especially in areas where MTT is prolonged, but had no apparent effect on the visually determined hypoperfusion volumes. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11979577     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  16 in total

1.  An improved model for describing the contrast bolus in perfusion MRI.

Authors:  Vishal Patil; Glyn Johnson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Optimizing dynamic T2* MR imaging for measurement of cerebral blood flow using infusions for cerebral blood volume.

Authors:  G C Newman; F E Hospod; S B Fain; T D Cook
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Multisite Concordance of DSC-MRI Analysis for Brain Tumors: Results of a National Cancer Institute Quantitative Imaging Network Collaborative Project.

Authors:  K M Schmainda; M A Prah; S D Rand; Y Liu; B Logan; M Muzi; S D Rane; X Da; Y-F Yen; J Kalpathy-Cramer; T L Chenevert; B Hoff; B Ross; Y Cao; M P Aryal; B Erickson; P Korfiatis; T Dondlinger; L Bell; L Hu; P E Kinahan; C C Quarles
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  A fully automated method for quantitative cerebral hemodynamic analysis using DSC-MRI.

Authors:  Atle Bjørnerud; Kyrre E Emblem
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Comparison of dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR methods: recommendations for measuring relative cerebral blood volume in brain tumors.

Authors:  Eric S Paulson; Kathleen M Schmainda
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI with localized arterial input functions.

Authors:  John J Lee; G Larry Bretthorst; Colin P Derdeyn; William J Powers; Tom O Videen; Abraham Z Snyder; Joanne Markham; Joshua S Shimony
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Increased hippocampal blood volume and normal blood flow in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Pratik Talati; Swati Rane; Jack Skinner; John Gore; Stephan Heckers
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Characterization of a first-pass gradient-echo spin-echo method to predict brain tumor grade and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Kathleen M Schmainda; Scott D Rand; Allen M Joseph; Rebecca Lund; B Doug Ward; Arvind P Pathak; John L Ulmer; Michael A Badruddoja; Michael A Baddrudoja; Hendrikus G J Krouwer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Evaluation of contrast agent dose and diffusion coefficient measurement on vessel size index estimation.

Authors:  Behrouz Vejdani Afkham; Sadegh Masjoodi; Mohammad Ali Oghabian; Seyed Roholah Ghodsi; Mohammad Reza Nazem Zadeh; Ebrahim Esmati; Mostafa Farzin; Maziar Gilasi; Hasan Hashemi
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Evaluation of MR markers that predict survival in patients with newly diagnosed GBM prior to adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Suja Saraswathy; Forrest W Crawford; Kathleen R Lamborn; Andrea Pirzkall; Susan Chang; Soonmee Cha; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.