Literature DB >> 11979449

Loss of heterozygosity analysis at the BRCA loci in tumor samples from patients with familial breast cancer.

Ana Osorio1, Miguel de la Hoya, Raquel Rodríguez-López, Angel Martínez-Ramírez, Alicia Cazorla, Juan José Granizo, Manel Esteller, Carmen Rivas, Trinidad Caldés, Javier Benítez.   

Abstract

The BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are responsible for a high proportion of familial breast cancer; germline mutations in these genes confer a lifetime risk of about 70% for developing breast cancer. Most of the described deleterious mutations are small deletions or insertions that originate a truncated protein; however, in many cases, they are amino acid changes whose significance is unknown. In these cases, there are some tests that can analyze the meaning of these variants, but most remain unclassified. The BRCA genes are tumor suppressors and it is believed that complete loss of the wild-type allele is a common mechanism of inactivation in tumors from patients carrying a germline deleterious mutation in these genes; if this is true, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis in the tumor sample could help to distinguish if a rare variant is either a deleterious mutation or a common polymorphism. In the present study, we performed LOH analysis at the BRCA loci in 47 tumors from patients who belonged to high-risk breast cancer families and were carriers of any type of alteration in these genes. Our results suggest that (i) loss of the wild-type allele is the most common mechanism of inactivation in tumors from patients who carry a deleterious mutation in any of the genes, (ii) this loss is not common when we analyze familial tumors not associated with mutations in BRCA and (iii) LOH can be used to clarify variants of unknown significance in the BRCA genes. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11979449     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.10337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  40 in total

1.  Pathogenicity of the BRCA1 missense variant M1775K is determined by the disruption of the BRCT phosphopeptide-binding pocket: a multi-modal approach.

Authors:  Marc Tischkowitz; Nancy Hamel; Marcelo A Carvalho; Gabriel Birrane; Aditi Soni; Erik H van Beers; Simon A Joosse; Nora Wong; David Novak; Louise A Quenneville; Scott A Grist; Petra M Nederlof; David E Goldgar; Sean V Tavtigian; Alvaro N Monteiro; John A A Ladias; William D Foulkes
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Epigenetic alterations in the breast: Implications for breast cancer detection, prognosis and treatment.

Authors:  Amy M Dworkin; Tim H-M Huang; Amanda Ewart Toland
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 15.707

3.  A Multiplex Homology-Directed DNA Repair Assay Reveals the Impact of More Than 1,000 BRCA1 Missense Substitution Variants on Protein Function.

Authors:  Lea M Starita; Muhtadi M Islam; Tapahsama Banerjee; Aleksandra I Adamovich; Justin Gullingsrud; Stanley Fields; Jay Shendure; Jeffrey D Parvin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  LOH analysis should not be used as a tool to assess whether UVs of BRCA1/2 are pathogenic or not.

Authors:  E Beristain; I Guerra; N Vidaurrazaga; J Burgos-Bretones; M I Tejada
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Prevalence of disease-causing genes in Japanese patients with BRCA1/2-wildtype hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.

Authors:  Tomoko Kaneyasu; Seiichi Mori; Hideko Yamauchi; Shozo Ohsumi; Shinji Ohno; Daisuke Aoki; Shinichi Baba; Junko Kawano; Yoshio Miki; Naomichi Matsumoto; Masao Nagasaki; Reiko Yoshida; Sadako Akashi-Tanaka; Takuji Iwase; Dai Kitagawa; Kenta Masuda; Akira Hirasawa; Masami Arai; Junko Takei; Yoshimi Ide; Osamu Gotoh; Noriko Yaguchi; Mitsuyo Nishi; Keika Kaneko; Yumi Matsuyama; Megumi Okawa; Misato Suzuki; Aya Nezu; Shiro Yokoyama; Sayuri Amino; Mayuko Inuzuka; Tetsuo Noda; Seigo Nakamura
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-06-12

6.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutational spectrum and evidence for genetic anticipation in Portuguese breast/ovarian cancer families.

Authors:  Ana Peixoto; Natália Salgueiro; Catarina Santos; Graça Varzim; Patrícia Rocha; Maria José Soares; Deolinda Pereira; Helena Rodrigues; Maria José Bento; António Fráguas; Graça Moura; Fernando Regateiro; Sérgio Castedo; Manuel R Teixeira
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 7.  Genetic susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  Nasim Mavaddat; Antonis C Antoniou; Douglas F Easton; Montserrat Garcia-Closas
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 6.603

8.  Association of the germline BRCA2 missense variation Glu2663Lys with high sensitivity to trabectedin-based treatment in soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Gianmaria Miolo; Alessandra Viel; Vincenzo Canzonieri; Tania Baresic; Angela Buonadonna; Davide Adriano Santeufemia; Della Puppa Lara; Giuseppe Corona
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2016-10-02       Impact factor: 4.742

9.  Clinically applicable models to characterize BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance.

Authors:  Andrew D Spearman; Kevin Sweet; Xiao-Ping Zhou; Jane McLennan; Fergus J Couch; Amanda Ewart Toland
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Detecting BRCA2 protein truncation in tissue biopsies to identify breast cancers that arise in BRCA2 gene mutation carriers.

Authors:  Patrice Watson; Rita Lieberman; Carrie Snyder; Vanessa J Clark; Henry T Lynch; Jeffrey T Holt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.