Literature DB >> 11979174

Impaired lumbar movement perception in association with postural stability and motor- and somatosensory-evoked potentials in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Ville Leinonen1, Sara Määttä, Simo Taimela, Arto Herno, Markku Kankaanpää, Juhani Partanen, Martti Kansanen, Osmo Hänninen, Olavi Airaksinen.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A descriptive study of the associations between different neurophysiologic findings in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ability to sense a change in lumbar position and the associations between lumbar movement perception, postural stability, and motor-evoked potentials and somatosensory-evoked potentials. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with low back pain have impaired postural control and impaired lumbar proprioception. Altered motor-evoked potentials and somatosensory-evoked potentials have been often observed in lumbar spinal stenosis.
METHODS: The study included 26 patients with clinically and radiologically diagnosed lumbar spinal stenosis. Their ability to sense lumbar rotation was assessed in a previously validated motorized trunk rotation unit in the seated position. The abilities to indicate the movement direction and the movement magnitude were used as indexes of the ability to sense the lumbar rotatory movement. The postural stability was measured with a vertical force platform. The motor-evoked potentials were elicited by transcranial and lumbar stimulation and recorded from anterior tibialis muscles. The somatosensory-evoked potentials were elicited by transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve at the ankle.
RESULTS: Twenty patients (76.9%; P = 0.006) reported the wrong movement direction. Furthermore, the patients consistently localized the movement sensation in their shoulders instead of the lumbar region. The altered motor-evoked potentials and somatosensory-evoked potentials were observed in 11 and 16 patients, respectively. Abnormal motor-evoked potentials had inconsistent associations with impaired movement perception and postural stability and abnormal somatosensory-evoked potentials had no associations with other findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with lumbar spinal stenosis have difficulties in sensing the lumbar rotational movement, which may indicate impaired proprioceptive abilities. Abnormal motor-evoked potentials and somatosensory-evoked potentials are also frequent in lumbar spinal stenosis but do not necessarily occur in the same patients as the abnormal ability to sense trunk movement. These new findings add to our understanding of the pathophysiology of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11979174     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200205010-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

1.  Clinical value of motor evoked potentials with transcranial magnetic stimulation in the assessment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Xinyu Liu; Shunsuke Konno; Masabumi Miyamoto; Yoshikazu Gembun; Gen Horiguchi; Hiromoto Ito
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Correlation of texture analysis of paraspinal musculature on MRI with different clinical endpoints: Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS).

Authors:  Manoj Mannil; Jakob M Burgstaller; Ulrike Held; Mazda Farshad; Roman Guggenberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Texture analysis of paraspinal musculature in MRI of the lumbar spine: analysis of the lumbar stenosis outcome study (LSOS) data.

Authors:  Manoj Mannil; Jakob M Burgstaller; Arjun Thanabalasingam; Sebastian Winklhofer; Michael Betz; Ulrike Held; Roman Guggenberger
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Inter-tester Reliability in Classifying Acute and Subacute Low Back Pain Patients into Clinical Subgroups: A Comparison of Specialists and Non-Specialists. A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Markku Paatelma; Eira Karvqnen; Ari Heinqnen
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

5.  Association between paraspinal muscle morphology, clinical symptoms and functional status in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Maryse Fortin; Àron Lazáry; Peter Paul Varga; Michele C Battié
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Comparison of trunk proprioception between patients with low back pain and healthy controls.

Authors:  Angela S Lee; Jacek Cholewicki; N Peter Reeves; Bohdanna T Zazulak; Lawrence W Mysliwiec
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Lumbar paraspinal and biceps brachii muscle function and movement perception in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Tommi Kääriäinen; Ville Leinonen; Simo Taimela; Timo Aalto; Heikki Kröger; Arto Herno; Veli Turunen; Sakari Savolainen; Markku Kankaanpää; Olavi Airaksinen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Increased incidence and severity of somatic dysfunction in subjects with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Karen T Snider; Jane C Johnson; Eric J Snider; Brian F Degenhardt
Journal:  J Am Osteopath Assoc       Date:  2008-08

9.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: assessment of cauda equina involvement by electrophysiological recordings.

Authors:  D Egli; O Hausmann; M Schmid; N Boos; V Dietz; A Curt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Lumbar position sense and the risk of low back injuries in college athletes: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sheri P Silfies; Jacek Cholewicki; N Peter Reeves; Hunter S Greene
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-12-31       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.