Literature DB >> 11979016

To screen or not to screen for pre-type 1 diabetes?

Desmond Schatz1, Jeffrey Krischer, Jin-Xiong She.   

Abstract

The incidence of type 1 diabetes is increasing worldwide and the disease is an onerous burden both to the individual and to society. There are thus important reasons to screen for the disease before it becomes manifest: (1) to improve understanding of the natural history of the prediabetic period; (2) to gain further insights into the immunopathogenesis of the disease; (3) to identify individuals for prevention trials; (4) to make an earlier diagnosis in order to reduce morbidity and mortality. Great strides have been made, yet there is still a great deal to be learned. Opponents of screening argue that screening tests for the disease have a low positive predictive value and that predicting the disease without a primary prevention capability raises ethical considerations because of induced stress, lifestyle changes, cost and potential effects on insurability. The greatest single barrier against large-scale population screening and prevention of the disease remains the lack of an effective intervention. However, screening in the context of well-designed research studies must continue - ultimately the benefit to the individual and to society will be immense. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11979016     DOI: 10.1159/000053306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Res        ISSN: 0301-0163


  5 in total

Review 1.  Psychological impact of screening and prediction in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Suzanne Bennett Johnson
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Enhancing the understanding of pre-type 1 diabetes in the general population.

Authors:  Olli Simell; William E Winter; Desmond Schatz
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 17.152

3.  Psychometric properties of the Pediatric Testing Attitudes Scale-Diabetes (P-TAS-D) for parents of children undergoing predictive risk screening.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Darren Mays; Suzanne Bennett Johnson; Johnny Ludvigsson; Ulrica Swartling
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.866

4.  Parental monitoring for type 1 diabetes in genetically at-risk young children: The TEDDY study.

Authors:  Laura B Smith; Kristian F Lynch; Kimberly A Driscoll; Suzanne Bennett Johnson
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.409

5.  My Child Is Islet Autoantibody Positive: Impact on Parental Anxiety.

Authors:  Suzanne Bennett Johnson; Kristian F Lynch; Roswith Roth; Desmond Schatz
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 17.152

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.