Literature DB >> 11978684

Immune responses to insulin aspart and biphasic insulin aspart in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Anders Lindholm1, Lisbeth B Jensen, Philip D Home, Philip Raskin, Bernhard O Boehm, Jacob Råstam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The antibody responses to a novel rapid-acting insulin analog, insulin aspart (IAsp), and their potential clinical correlates were studied with a specifically developed method in 2,420 people with diabetes treated for up to 1 year with preprandial subcutaneous injections of IAsp. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Circulating insulin antibodies were analyzed by radioimmunoassay with (125)I insulin or IAsp tracers and polyethylene glycol precipitation. Four multinational, open, parallel group studies were conducted in Europe and North America, with a total of 1,534 people with diabetes exposed to IAsp and 886 people exposed to human insulin (HI) as meal-related insulin for 6-12 months.
RESULTS: Insulin antibodies specific to HI or IAsp were absent in a majority of patients throughout the 6- to 12-month study periods. A majority of the patients (64-68%) had antibodies cross-reacting between HI and IAsp when entering the studies, with baseline levels (means +/- SD of percent bound/total) of 16.6 +/- 16.3% in study 1 and 10.3 +/- 14.0% in study 4. In all four studies, cross-reactive antibodies increased in patients exposed to IAsp, with a maximum at 3 months, and thereafter there was a decline toward baseline levels at 9-12 months (levels at 3 and 12 months: 22.3 +/- 19.7 and 16.8 +/- 16.5% in study 1 and 21.5 +/- 21.9 and 16.9 +/- 17.4% in study 4). Antibody levels showed similar changes in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and there was no consistent relationship between antibody formation and glycemic control or between antibody formation and safety in terms of adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with IAsp is associated with an increase in cross-reactive insulin antibodies, with a subsequent fall toward baseline values, without any indication of clinical relevance because no effect on efficacy or safety could be identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11978684     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.5.876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  39 in total

1.  Within-patient variation of the pharmacokinetics of subcutaneously injected biphasic insulin aspart as assessed by compartmental modelling.

Authors:  W H O Clausen; A De Gaetano; A Vølund
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 2.  The utility and efficacy of the new insulins in the management of diabetes and pregnancy.

Authors:  David Simmons
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  Evaluation of insulin antibodies and placental transfer of insulin aspart in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D R McCance; P Damm; E R Mathiesen; M Hod; R Kaaja; F Dunne; L E Jensen; H Mersebach
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 4.  Gestational diabetes mellitus: insulinic management.

Authors:  Navneet Magon; Veerasamy Seshiah
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-03-18

Review 5.  Insulin aspart: a review of its use in the management of type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Neil A Reynolds; Antona J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Short-acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin for adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Birgit Fullerton; Andrea Siebenhofer; Klaus Jeitler; Karl Horvath; Thomas Semlitsch; Andrea Berghold; Johannes Plank; Thomas R Pieber; Ferdinand M Gerlach
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-06-30

Review 7.  Allergic reactions to human insulin: a review of current knowledge and treatment options.

Authors:  Baris Akinci; Serkan Yener; Firat Bayraktar; Sena Yesil
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.633

8.  Insulin aspart : an evidence-based medicine review.

Authors:  Alan Haycox
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 9.  Insulin aspart: a review of its use in the management of type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Therese M Chapman; Stuart Noble; Karen L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Comparison of a soluble co-formulation of insulin degludec/insulin aspart vs biphasic insulin aspart 30 in type 2 diabetes: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Leo Niskanen; Lawrence A Leiter; Edward Franek; Jianping Weng; Taner Damci; Manuel Muñoz-Torres; Jean-Paul Donnet; Lars Endahl; Trine Vang Skjøth; Allan Vaag
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 6.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.