Literature DB >> 11978210

Do all hospitals need cesarean delivery capability? An outcomes study of maternity care in a rural hospital without on-site cesarean capability.

Lawrence Leeman1, Rebecca Leeman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We analyzed perinatal outcomes at a rural hospital without cesarean delivery capability. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a historical cohort outcomes study. POPULATION: The study population included all pregnant women at 20 weeks or greater of gestational age (n = 1132) over a 5-year period in a predominantly Native American region of northwestern New Mexico. OUTCOMES MEASURED: The outcomes studied included perinatal mortality, neonatal morbidity, obstetric emergencies, intrapartum and antepartum transfers, and cesarean delivery rate. We did a detailed case review of all obstetric emergencies and low-Apgar-score births at Zuni-Ramah Hospital and all cesarean deliveries for fetal distress at referral hospitals.
RESULTS: Of the 1132 women in the study population, 64.7% (n = 735) were able to give birth at the hospital without operative facilities; 25.6% (n = 290) were transferred before labor; and 9.5% (n = 107) were transferred during labor. The perinatal mortality rate of 11.4 per 1000 (95% confidence interval, 5.1-17.8) was similar to the nationwide rate of 12.8 per 1000 even though Zuni-Ramah has a high-risk obstetric population. No instances of major neonatal or maternal morbidity caused by lack of surgical facilities occurred. The cesarean delivery rate of 7.3% was significantly lower than the nationwide rate of 20.7% (P &lt.001). The incidence of neonates with low Apgar scores (0.54%) was significantly lower than the nationwide rate (1.4%). The incidence of neonates requiring resuscitation (3.4%) was comparable to the nationwide rate (2.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a rural maternity care unit without surgical facilities can safely allow a high proportion of women to give birth closer to their communities. This study demonstrated a low level of perinatal risk. Most transfers were made for induction or augmentation of labor. Rural hospitals that do not have cesarean delivery capability but are part of an integrated perinatal system can safely offer obstetric services by using appropriate antepartum and intrapartum screening criteria for obstetric risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11978210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  10 in total

1.  New approaches for rural maternity care.

Authors:  Lisa Graves
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Genetic variants, endothelial function, and risk of preeclampsia among American Indians.

Authors:  Lyle G Best; Melanie Nadeau; Shellee Bercier; Sara Dauphinais; Jacob Davis; Kylie Davis; Shyleen Poitra; Cindy M Anderson
Journal:  Hypertens Pregnancy       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 2.108

3.  Does having cesarean section capability make a difference to a small rural maternity service?

Authors:  Nancy Lynch; Harvey Thommasen; Nancy Anderson; Stefan Grzybowski
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Reducing stillbirths: interventions during labour.

Authors:  Gary L Darmstadt; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Rachel A Haws; Esme V Menezes; Tanya Soomro; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  A Native American community with a 7% cesarean delivery rate: does case mix, ethnicity, or labor management explain the low rate?

Authors:  Lawrence Leeman; Rebecca Leeman
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Utilization of antenatal care services in a remote, tribal and hilly district of Himachal Pradesh: Challenges to access.

Authors:  Neha Purohit
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-09-30

7.  Cultures of risk and their influence on birth in rural British Columbia.

Authors:  Jude Kornelsen; Stefan Grzybowski
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  The safety of Canadian rural maternity services: a multi-jurisdictional cohort analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Grzybowski; John Fahey; Barbara Lai; Sharon Zhang; Nancy Aelicks; Brenda M Leung; Kathrin Stoll; Rebecca Attenborough
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  A retrospective observational study of obstetric care in rural Andhra Pradesh by Dangoria Charitable Trust (1979 to 2009).

Authors:  Devyani Dangoria; Sandro Pampallona; Swarna N Lata; Paola Bollini
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Predictors of institutional delivery service utilization among women of reproductive age in Gambia: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Sanni Yaya; Ghose Bishwajit
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.007

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.