| Literature DB >> 34760760 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A traditional African phrase, 'A pregnant woman has one foot in the grave' expresses the immense health risks associated with pregnancy and childbirth. Antenatal care (ANC) is considered an important determinant to alleviate mortalities and morbidities associated with maternal health.Entities:
Keywords: Antenatal care; maternal health; remote; tribal health; utilization
Year: 2021 PMID: 34760760 PMCID: PMC8565120 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_426_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Family Med Prim Care ISSN: 2249-4863
Demographic Profile of respondents
| Age (years) | Age at first pregnancy (years) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 19-24 | 26 (25%) | 15-20 | 27 (26%) |
| 25-30 | 38 (37%) | 21-26 | 49 (48%) |
| 31-36 | 27 (26%) | 27-32 | 22 (21%) |
| 37-44 | 12 (12%) | 33-38 | 5 (5%) |
| Religion | Caste | ||
| Buddhism | 64 (62%) | Scheduled tribe | 88 (86%) |
| Hinduism | 39 (38%) | Scheduled caste | 13 (12%) |
| Education level | Educational level of spouses | ||
| No formal education | 9 (9%) | No formal education | 1 (1%) |
| Up to primary level | 7 (6%) | Up to primary level | 8 (8%) |
| Up to secondary level | 24 (23%) | Up to secondary level | 20 (19%) |
| Senior secondary level and above | 63 (62%) | Senior secondary level and above | 74 (72%) |
| Occupation | Per head monthly income (INR) | ||
| Home makers | 89 (86%) | 0-5000 | 40 (39%) |
| Public sector | 9 (9%) | 5001-10000 | 27 (26%) |
| Private sector | 2 (2%) | 10001-20000 | 28 (27%) |
| Self-owned work | 3 (3%) | >20000 | 8 (8%) |
| Family size | Parity | ||
| <5 | 14 (14%) | 1 | 45 (44%) |
| ≥5 | 89 (86%) | 2 | 40 (39%) |
| 3 | 18 (17%) |
Details of ANC visits by the respondents
| First ANC visit | Total number of ANC visits | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤12 weeks | 99 (96%) | <4 | 11 (11%) |
| >12 weeks | 4 (4%) | ≥4 | 92 (89%) |
| Number of health facilities visited for antenatal care | |||
| 1 | 34 (33%) | ||
| 2 | 45 (44%) | ||
| ≥3 | 24 (23%) | ||
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 1 | 7 (6.8%) | 15 (14.6%) | 6 (5.9%) |
| 2 | 21 (20.5%) | 11 (10.7%) | 3 (2.9%) |
| 3 | 30 (29.3%) | 8 (7.7%) | 8 (7.7%) |
| ≥4 | 38 (36.6%) | 15 (14.6%) | 10 (9.8%) |
| Did not visit | 7 (6.8%) | 54 (52.4%) | 76 (73.7%) |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 0-50 | 21 (21%) | 0 | 21 (21%) |
| 51-150 | 16 (16%) | 101-500 | 31 (30%) |
| 150-200 | 22 (21%) | 501-1000 | 19 (18%) |
| 201-250 | 20 (19%) | 1001-2000 | 24 (23%) |
| 251-500 | 24 (23%) | 2001-10000 | 8 (8%) |
Details of utilization of ANC services
| Type of heath facility accessed for prenatal tests | Type of health facility accessed for tetanus toxoid (TT) vaccination | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Government facility in Lahaul | 90 (87%) | Government facility in Lahaul | 91 (88%) |
| Private facility in Lahaul (Not available) | 0 (0%) | Government facility in another district | 10 (10%) |
| Government facility in another district | 4 (4%) | Private facility in another district | 1 (1%) |
| Private facility in another district | 9 (9%) | Did not get TT vaccination | 1 (1%) |
| Number of ultrasound | Place of ultrasound | ||
| 1 | 18 (17%) | Government facilities in Lahaul | 59 (60%) |
| 2 | 67 (65%) | Government facilities in Lahaul and other districts | 15 (16%) |
| ≥3 | 13 (13%) | Government facilities in Lahaul and private facilities in other districts | 12 (12%) |
| Did not take | 5 (5%) | Private facilities in other districts | 12 (12%) |
| Cost of consultation fee for complete antenatal care (INR) | Cost of all ultrasounds (INR) | ||
| 0 | 88 (85%) | 0 | 74 (76%) |
| 500-1500 | 4 (4%) | 500-1500 | 9 (9%) |
| 1501-2500 | 10 (10%) | 1501-2500 | 10 (10%) |
| 2501-3500 | 1 (1%) | 2501-4000 | 5 (5%) |
| Number of months of iron intake | Source of iron tablets | ||
| <3 | 8 (8%) | Government facility | 94 (91%) |
| ≥3 | 93 (90%) | Private facility | 8 (8%) |
| Did not take | 2 (2%) | Didn’t get/buy | 1 (1%) |
| Number of months of calcium intake | Source of calcium tablets | ||
| <3 | 26 (25%) | Government facility | 39 (38%) |
| ≥3 | 76 (74%) | Private facility | 15 (15%) |
| Did not take | 1 (1%) | Both government and private facilities | 48 (47%) |
Details of Relocation to other districts during maternity period
| Trimester during shift of place of residence | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| First trimester | 13 (13%) | ||
| Second trimester | 17 (16%) | ||
| Third trimester | 46 (45%) | ||
| Did not change | 27 (26%) | ||
| Distance travelled to reach the shifted residence (in kilometres) | |||
| 100-200 | 53 (70%) | ||
| 201-300 | 10 (13%) | ||
| >300 | 13 (17%) | ||
| Mode of transport used to reach shifted residence | Range of cost of transport (INR) (one way) | ||
| Taxi | 47 (62%) | 600-3000 | |
| Own vehicle | 20 (26%) | 0 | |
| Bus | 7 (9%) | 50-250 | |
| Flight | 2 (3%) | 1500-3000 | |
| Type of shifted residence | |||
| Self-owned | 21 (28%) | ||
| Relative’s place | 24 (31%) | ||
| Maternal house | 6 (8%) | ||
| Rented | 25 (33%) | ||
| Cost of living due to shifted residence (INR) | |||
| 0 | 50 (66%) | ||
| 1-10000 | 15 (20%) | ||
| 10001-20000 | 7 (9%) | ||
| 20000-50000 | 4 (5%) | ||