Literature DB >> 11976767

Lateralization in motor facilitation during action observation: a TMS study.

Lisa Aziz-Zadeh1, Fumiko Maeda, Eran Zaidel, John Mazziotta, Marco Iacoboni.   

Abstract

Action observation facilitates corticospinal excitability. This is presumably due to a premotor neural system that is active when we perform actions and when we observe actions performed by others. It has been speculated that this neural system is a precursor of neural systems subserving language. If this theory is true, we may expect hemispheric differences in the motor facilitation produced by action observation, with the language-dominant left hemisphere showing stronger facilitation than the right hemisphere. Furthermore, it has been suggested that body parts are recognized via cortical regions controlling sensory and motor processing associated with that body part. If this is true, then corticospinal facilitation during action observation should be modulated by the laterality of the observed body part. The present study addressed these two issues using TMS for each motor cortex separately as participants observed actions being performed by a left hand, a right hand, or a control stimulus on the computer screen. We found no overall difference between the right and left hemisphere for motor-evoked potential (MEP) size during action observation. However, when TMS was applied to the left motor cortex, MEPs were larger while observing right hand actions. Likewise, when TMS was applied to the right motor cortex, MEPs were larger while observing left hand actions. Our data do not suggest left hemisphere superiority in the facilitating effects of action observation on the motor system. However, they do support the notion of a sensory-motor loop according to which sensory stimulus properties (for example, the image of a left hand or a right hand) directly affect motor cortex activity, even when no motor output is required. The pattern of this effect is congruent with the pattern of motor representation in each hemisphere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11976767     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1037-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  63 in total

1.  Modulation of the response to a somatosensory stimulation of the hand during the observation of manual actions.

Authors:  Julien I A Voisin; Erika C Rodrigues; Sébastien Hétu; Philip L Jackson; Claudia D Vargas; Francine Malouin; C Elaine Chapman; Catherine Mercier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  General motor representations are developed during action-observation.

Authors:  Spencer J Hayes; Digby Elliott; Simon J Bennett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Human motor plasticity induced by mirror visual feedback.

Authors:  Ippei Nojima; Tatsuya Mima; Satoko Koganemaru; Mohamed Nasreldin Thabit; Hidenao Fukuyama; Toshio Kawamata
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  One's motor performance predictably modulates the understanding of others' actions through adaptation of premotor visuo-motor neurons.

Authors:  Luigi Cattaneo; Guido Barchiesi; Davide Tabarelli; Carola Arfeller; Marc Sato; Arthur M Glenberg
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Mirror, mirror on the wall: viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability.

Authors:  M I Garry; A Loftus; J J Summers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Observation of a finger or an object movement primes imitative responses differentially.

Authors:  M Jonas; K Biermann-Ruben; K Kessler; R Lange; T Bäumer; H R Siebner; A Schnitzler; A Münchau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Action observation improves motor imagery: specific interactions between simulative processes.

Authors:  Massimiliano Conson; Marco Sarà; Francesca Pistoia; Luigi Trojano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Motor excitability during imagination and observation of foot dorsiflexions.

Authors:  Joachim Liepert; Nina Neveling
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Seeing touch in the somatosensory cortex: a TMS study of the visual perception of touch.

Authors:  Nadia Bolognini; Angela Rossetti; Angelo Maravita; Carlo Miniussi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain.

Authors:  Svenja Caspers; Karl Zilles; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.