Literature DB >> 11972466

Accuracy of CT in local staging of gallbladder carcinoma.

B S Kim1, H K Ha, I-J Lee, J H Kim, H W Eun, I Y Bae, A Y Kim, T K Kim, M H Kim, S K Lee, W Kang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of CT for staging gallbladder cancers, especially the T-factor of the TNM staging system.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: CT investigations of 100 patients with surgically proven gallbladder cancers were retrospectively analyzed. Dynamic helical CT was performed in 16 patients and conventional CT in the remaining 84. On CT, three radiologists attempted tumor staging for these patients; the majority opinion was used for final decision. According to CT protocols (dynamic helical CT vs. conventional CT) and each tumor type (thickened wall/intraluminal mass/massive), the accuracy of CT staging was compared. The CT staging was correlated with the surgico-pathologic results.
RESULTS: The overall accuracy of CT for staging gallbladder cancers was 71%; it was 79% for T1 and T2 tumors, 46% for T3 tumors, and 73% for T4 tumors. For all three readers, the poorest accuracy was obtained in T3 tumors. No statistically significant difference was noted in the accuracy between the groups undergoing conventional CT and dynamic helical CT. A statistically significant difference was noted in the accuracy for staging thickened wall and intraluminal mass types of tumors (p<0.05); the highest accuracy was obtained in the intraluminal mass type (89%) and the massive type (83%), while it was 54% in the thickened wall type.
CONCLUSION: The accuracy of tumor staging with CT in patients with gallbladder cancer depends on the morphological type of tumor. The poorest result is obtained in the thickened wall type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11972466     DOI: 10.1080/028418502127347475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.701


  9 in total

Review 1.  Gallbladder carcinoma incidentally encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: how to deal with it.

Authors:  Ketao Jin; Huanrong Lan; Tieming Zhu; Kuifeng He; Lisong Teng
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Computed Tomographic Findings in 50 Cases of Gall Bladder Carcinoma.

Authors:  R A George; S C Godara; P Dhagat; P P Som
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

3.  Clinical usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of gallbladder wall thickening.

Authors:  Hong Joo Kim; Jung Ho Park; Dong Il Park; Yong Kyun Cho; Chong Il Sohn; Woo Kyu Jeon; Byung Ik Kim; Seon Hyeong Choi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Gall bladder carcinoma: Aggressive malignancy with protean loco-regional and distant spread.

Authors:  Amit Nandan Dhar Dwivedi; Shivi Jain; Ruhi Dixit
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Does PET-CT scan have a role prior to radical re-resection for incidental gallbladder cancer?

Authors:  Parul J Shukla; Savio G Barreto; Supreeta Arya; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Rohini Hawaldar; Nilendu Purandare; Venkatesh Rangarajan
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Preoperative differentiation between T1a and ≥T1b gallbladder cancer: combined interpretation of high-resolution ultrasound and multidetector-row computed tomography.

Authors:  Ijin Joo; Jae Young Lee; Jee Hyun Baek; Jung Hoon Kim; Hee Sun Park; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Surgical management of biliary malignancy.

Authors:  T Peter Kingham; Victoria G Aveson; Alice C Wei; Jason A Castellanos; Peter J Allen; Daniel P Nussbaum; Yinin Hu; Michael I D'Angelica
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Differences between images of large adenoma and protruding type of gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Wangxun Jin; Chengwu Zhang; Xiaodong He; Yuyun Xu; Li Wang; Zhongsheng Zhao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 9.  Diagnosis and surgical management of gallbladder cancer: a review.

Authors:  Kaye M Reid; Antonio Ramos-De la Medina; John H Donohue
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.267

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.