Literature DB >> 11972383

Recruitment strategies for cervical cancer prevention study.

W R Brewster1, H Anton-Culver, A Ziogas, J Largent, S Howe, F A Hubbell, A Manetta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe recruitment strategies for a single-visit cervical cancer prevention study.
METHODS: From January through December 1999, low-income, predominantly Latino women were recruited to participate in a single-visit cervical cancer prevention study. For the first 6 months, all women who had ever visited one of two community-based study clinics were invited to participate (clinic registry recruitment). For the remainder of the year, recruitment was modified to be primarily inclusive of advertisements in English- and Spanish-language community newspapers and fliers left in local businesses and organizations (media campaign recruitment). Eligible volunteers were randomized to one of two study arms, usual-care program or single-visit program. All study subjects completed demographic and medical questionnaires delivered by bilingual staff. Women who declined to participate in this study were asked to provide reasons for this preference. Statistical analyses included the use of chi-square, logistic regression, and Student's t test.
RESULTS: The proportion of women who agreed to participate was higher in the media recruitment group than in the clinic registry group [51% (535/1041) compared to 26% (405/1542), P < 0.001]. The no-show rate among participants solicited from the media strategy was significantly less than that from the clinic registry. There were no significant differences in the median age, number of months since the last Papanicolaou smear, incidence of abnormal Papanicolaou smear, education, or income of the subjects based on the recruitment strategy.
CONCLUSION: A media-based recruitment strategy was effective for this single-visit cervical prevention study. This approach may be effective for recruitment of other low-income groups to clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11972383     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  12 in total

Review 1.  Increasing Cervical Cancer Screening Among US Hispanics/Latinas: A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lilli Mann; Kristie L Foley; Amanda E Tanner; Christina J Sun; Scott D Rhodes
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Viva bien!: Overcoming recruitment challenges in a multiple-risk-factor diabetes trial.

Authors:  Deborah J Toobert; Lisa A Strycker; Russell E Glasgow; Diego Osuna; Alyssa Tinley Doty; Manuel Barrera; Cristy R Geno; Debra P Ritzwoller
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  Recruiting vulnerable populations into research: a systematic review of recruitment interventions.

Authors:  Stacy J UyBico; Shani Pavel; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Recruiting underrepresented groups into the Carbohydrates and Related Biomarkers (CARB) cancer prevention feeding study.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Stephanie Ondelacy; Yvonne Schwarz; Catherine Duggan; Johanna W Lampe; Marian L Neuhouser
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Recruitment of minority and underserved populations in the United States: the Centers for Population Health and Health Disparities experience.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Katherine W Reeves; John M McLaughlin; Mira L Katz; Ann Scheck McAlearney; Mack T Ruffin; Chanita Hughes Halbert; Cristina Merete; Faith Davis; Sarah Gehlert
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Novel Method for Recruiting Representative At-Risk Individuals into Cancer Prevention Trials: Online Health Risk Assessment in Employee Wellness Programs.

Authors:  Siu-Kuen Azor Hui; Suzanne M Miller; Leah Hazuda; Kimberly Engelman; Edward F Ellerbeck
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  The National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Trial Accrual Symposium: summary and recommendations.

Authors:  Andrea M Denicoff; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Stephen S Grubbs; Suanna S Bruinooge; Robert L Comis; Peggy Devine; David M Dilts; Michelle E Duff; Jean G Ford; Steven Joffe; Lidia Schapira; Kevin P Weinfurt; Margo Michaels; Derek Raghavan; Ellen S Richmond; Robin Zon; Terrance L Albrecht; Michael A Bookman; Afshin Dowlati; Rebecca A Enos; Mona N Fouad; Marjorie Good; William J Hicks; Patrick J Loehrer; Alan P Lyss; Steven N Wolff; Debra M Wujcik; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 8.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Thomas Everett; Andrew Bryant; Michelle F Griffin; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Carol A Forbes; Ruth G Jepson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-05-11

9.  Recruiting ethnically diverse general internal medicine patients for a telephone survey on physician-patient communication.

Authors:  Anna M Nápoles-Springer; Jasmine Santoyo; Anita L Stewart
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Helen Staley; Aslam Shiraz; Norman Shreeve; Andrew Bryant; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Ketankumar Gajjar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.