Literature DB >> 11971847

Prehospital selection of patients for thrombolysis by paramedics.

K Pitt1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Heart disease is the major cause of death in Wales. Myocardial infarction accounts for most fatalities either acutely or as a result of late heart failure and unheralded sudden cardiac death. Prompt relief of new coronary occlusions by thrombolytic agents has been shown to reduce significantly both early mortality and subsequent morbidity from acute myocardial infarction. The prehospital delivery of these drugs is feasible, and carries no greater risk than administration in hospital. This study tests the hypothesis that paramedics can identify patients with acute myocardial infarction who are suitable for prehospital thrombolysis, and thus reduce the "call to needle" time.
METHOD: Paramedics from rural Wales were trained in the acquisition and recognition of 12 lead ECGs, and also in the modified indications for thrombolytic therapy as defined by the Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee (JRCALC). Ninety six consecutive patients, with possible myocardial infarction, were included in the study. The paramedics made an independent decision regarding the eligibility of the patients for thrombolysis before hospital admission, noting the time that they could have administered the drug. These decisions were compared with the treatment subsequently received in hospital.
RESULTS: No errors were made by the paramedics in case selection (specificity of 100% (95% CI 95.9% to 100%)). There was a potential reduction in call to needle time of 41.2 minutes (95% CI 25.7 minutes to 56.9 minutes, p=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the paramedic selection of patients for the prehospital administration of a thrombolytic is both feasible and safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11971847      PMCID: PMC1725850          DOI: 10.1136/emj.19.3.260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  6 in total

1.  The risk of stroke in patients with acute myocardial infarction after thrombolytic and antithrombotic treatment. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico II (GISSI-2), and The International Study Group.

Authors:  A P Maggioni; M G Franzosi; E Santoro; H White; F Van de Werf; G Tognoni
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-07-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H D White; F J Van de Werf
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-04-28       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Quantification of the benefit of earlier thrombolytic therapy: five-year results of the Grampian Region Early Anistreplase Trial (GREAT).

Authors:  J M Rawles
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Treating menstruating women with thrombolytic therapy: insights from the global utilization of streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator for occluded coronary arteries (GUSTO-I) trial.

Authors:  S L Karnash; C B Granger; H D White; L H Woodlief; E J Topol; R M Califf
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of evolving cell injury during regional myocardial ischemia in the dog: the "border zone" controversy.

Authors:  D M Yellon; D J Hearse; R Crome; R K Wyse
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Continuously updated 12-lead ST-segment recovery analysis for myocardial infarct artery patency assessment and its correlation with multiple simultaneous early angiographic observations.

Authors:  M W Krucoff; M A Croll; J E Pope; K S Pieper; P M Kanani; C B Granger; R F Veldkamp; B L Wagner; S T Sawchak; R M Califf
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1993-01-15       Impact factor: 2.778

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Potential impact of interventions to reduce times to thrombolysis.

Authors:  S Goodacre; A-M Kelly; D Kerr
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  A qualitative study of paramedics' attitudes to providing prehospital thrombolysis.

Authors:  L Price; P Keeling; G Brown; D Hughes; A Barton
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  What percentages of patients are suitable for prehospital thrombolysis?

Authors:  N Castle; R Owen; R Vincent; N Ineson
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Evaluation of emergency medical services systems: a classification to assist in determination of indicators.

Authors:  C MacFarlane; C A Benn
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Limited benefits of ambulance telemetry in delivering early thrombolysis: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Woollard; K Pitt; A J Hayward; N C Taylor
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.740

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.