Literature DB >> 11971754

Selection of test chemicals for the ECVAM international validation study on in vitro embryotoxicity tests. European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods.

Nigel A Brown1.   

Abstract

The European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) has sponsored a large international prevalidation and validation study of three embryotoxicity tests, involving embryonic stem cells, limb bud micromass cultures, and post-implantation whole-embryo cultures. The main objective of the study was to assess the performance of these in vitro tests in discriminating between non-embryotoxic, weakly embryotoxic and strongly embryotoxic compounds. An initial part of the study was to select 20 test substances for the formal validation trial, conducted under blind conditions. A database of in vivo and in vitro developmental toxicity test results was complied on 310 chemicals that had been used in previous validation studies, or suggested for such use, or that had good quality "segment II"-type in vivo data, or for which there were human data. From this database, a shortlist of about 30 candidates was constructed. Because the ECVAM study would not include metabolic activation, chemicals known to require activation for their developmental effects were excluded as candidates, although some known stable metabolites were included. Attempts were made: to include substances of diverse mechanism; to avoid overemphasis on pharmaceuticals; to avoid biologically inert substances as non-embryotoxicants; and to make the list different from those used previously. The candidates were of three categories: Class 3, strongly embryotoxic, was defined as developmentally toxic in all species tested, inducing multiple developmental effects, and with a high A/D ratio. Class 1, non-embryotoxic, was defined as not developmentally toxic at maternally toxic exposures, but which may show some minor embryo/fetal toxicity, which cannot be separated from maternal toxicity. Class 2, weakly embryotoxic, were chemicals of intermediate activity. From this candidate list, chemicals of known receptor (androgen, oestrogen, glucocorticoid, aryl hydrocarbon) mechanisms were excluded, on the basis that simple tests for such activity are already available. In addition, chemicals not freely available were excluded, and an emphasis on human data was applied. The final list of 20 chemicals was: Class 3--6-aminonicotinamide, 5-bromo- 2'-deoxyuridine, hydroxyurea, methylmercury chloride, methotrexate, all-trans-retinoic acid; Class 2--boric acid, dimethadione, lithium chloride, methoxyacetic acid, valproic acid (VPA), 2-propyl-4-pentynoic acid (4-yn-VPA), salicylic acid sodium salt; and Class 1--acrylamide, D-(+)-camphor, dimethyl phthalate, diphenhydramine hydrochloride, 2-ethyl-4- methylpentanoic acid (isobutyl-ethyl-VPA), Penicillin G sodium salt, saccharin sodium hydrate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11971754     DOI: 10.1177/026119290203000205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Altern Lab Anim        ISSN: 0261-1929            Impact factor:   1.303


  10 in total

Review 1.  Alternative models in developmental toxicology.

Authors:  Hyung-yul Lee; Amy L Inselman; Jyotshnabala Kanungo; Deborah K Hansen
Journal:  Syst Biol Reprod Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.061

2.  The validated embryonic stem cell test to predict embryotoxicity in vitro.

Authors:  Andrea E M Seiler; Horst Spielmann
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  The embryonic stem cell test as tool to assess structure-dependent teratogenicity: the case of valproic acid.

Authors:  Christian Riebeling; Ralph Pirow; Klaus Becker; Roland Buesen; Daniel Eikel; Johanna Kaltenhäuser; Frauke Meyer; Heinz Nau; Birgitta Slawik; Anke Visan; Jutta Volland; Horst Spielmann; Andreas Luch; Andrea Seiler
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Pluripotent stem cell assays: Modalities and applications for predictive developmental toxicity.

Authors:  Aldert H Piersma; Nancy C Baker; George P Daston; Burkhard Flick; Michio Fujiwara; Thomas B Knudsen; Horst Spielmann; Noriyuki Suzuki; Katya Tsaioun; Hajime Kojima
Journal:  Curr Res Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-13

Review 5.  Toward better assessments of developmental toxicity using stem cell-based in vitro embryogenesis models.

Authors:  Yusuke Marikawa
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.661

6.  Effects of multivitamins and known teratogens on chick cardiomyocytes micromass culture assay.

Authors:  Samreen Memon; Margaret Pratten
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.699

7.  Effects of ethylene glycol monomethyl ether and its metabolite, 2-methoxyacetic acid, on organogenesis stage mouse limbs in vitro.

Authors:  Caroline Dayan; Barbara F Hales
Journal:  Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2014-05-02

Review 8.  Cord Blood Cells for Developmental Toxicology and Environmental Health.

Authors:  Dora Il'yasova; Noreen Kloc; Alexander Kinev
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2015-12-03

9.  A large scale mass spectrometry-based histone screening for assessing epigenetic developmental toxicity.

Authors:  Laura De Clerck; Maarten Dhaenens; Sigrid Verhelst; Bart Van Puyvelde; Sander Willems; Simon Daled; Senne Cornelis; Laura Corveleyn; Ewoud Willems; Dieter Deforce
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Non-human primate and rodent embryonic stem cells are differentially sensitive to embryotoxic compounds.

Authors:  Lauren Walker; Laura Baumgartner; Kevin C Keller; Julia Ast; Susanne Trettner; Nicole I Zur Nieden
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2014-12-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.