Literature DB >> 11967689

Transitions in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the impact of ambulatory surgery.

H Lau1, D C Brooks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common practice in the United States, but its development remains slow in most other countries. The objective of the current study was to report the impact of ambulatory surgery on the practice of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a major teaching hospital since the inception of the service.
METHODS: The hospital database of patients who underwent cholecystectomies for benign hepatobiliary pathologies was reviewed between January 1993 and December 1999. Changes in the practice of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the length of hospital stay were analyzed. Clinical characteristics of the ambulatory and inpatient groups were compared.
RESULTS: Of 2,891 laparoscopic cholecystectomies involved in the current study, 888 (31%) were performed as day cases, and 2,003 (69%) were performed as inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The annual number of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomies increased from 3 (0.6%) in 1993 to 212 (48%) in 1997. This was followed by a plateau in the next 3 years. The ambulatory group comprised a significantly higher prevalence of young women (87%) who underwent surgery mainly for biliary colic (88%).
CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated a net trend toward ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy and a shorter length of hospital stay. Almost half of our patients with gallstone disease currently are using the ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy service, with young women constituting the majority. We predict that ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy heralds the wave of the future, and our experience may serve as a blueprint for other institutions wishing to embark on this journey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11967689     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-8114-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  7 in total

1.  Is there still any role for minilaparoscopic-cholecystectomy? A general surgeons' last five years experience over 932 cases.

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Natalino Bedin
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2011-11-11

2.  A prospective study of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: training economic, and patient benefits.

Authors:  P K Jain; J D Hayden; P C Sedman; C M S Royston; C J O'Boyle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study assessing the impact of grade of operating surgeon on operative time and 30-day morbidity.

Authors:  H Tafazal; P Spreadborough; D Zakai; N Shastri-Hurst; S Ayaani; M Hanif
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Analysis of a structured training programme in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Salleh Ibrahim; Khoon Hean Tay; Swee Ho Lim; T Ravintharan; Ngian Chye Tan
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  A meta-analysis of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N Z Ahmad; G Byrnes; S A Naqvi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Outpatient laparoscopic surgery: feasibility and consequences for education and health care costs.

Authors:  J Skattum; B Edwin; E Trondsen; O Mjåland; J Raede; T Buanes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Weiwei Chen; Qiang Wu; Ning Fu; Zhiming Yang; Jingcheng Hao
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.