Literature DB >> 11966969

Effect of wash bulk on the accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impressions.

J Nissan1, M Gross, A Shifman, D Assif.   

Abstract

Variations in the bulk of wash in a putty-wash impression technique can result in dimensional changes proportional to the thickness of the wash material during setting. The purpose of the study was to determine the amount of wash necessary to achieve accurate stone models while using a two-step putty-wash impression technique with polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impression material. A total of 45 impressions were made of a stainless steel master model, 15 impressions for each wash thickness (1, 2 and 3 mm). The model contained three full-crown abutment preparations, which were used as the positive control. Accuracy was assessed by measuring six dimensions (occlusogingival and interabutments) on stone dies poured from impressions of the master model. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed statistically significant differences amongst the three wash bulk groups, for all occlusogingival and interabutment measurements (P < 0.001). The overall discrepancies of the groups using wash thickness of 1 and 2 mm were smaller than the group with 3 mm wash thickness. Therefore, wash bulks of 1 and 2 mm were most accurate for fabricating stone dies, using PVS impression materials. This can be achieved by using the temporary crown to create the desired wash space in the preliminary putty impression. Wash thickness > 2 mm was inadequate to obtain accurate stone dies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11966969     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00820.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  8 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of dimensional accuracy of different polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques-in vitro study.

Authors:  Ramandeep Dugal; Bhargavi Railkar; Smita Musani
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-10-26

2.  Accuracy of Single-Step versus 2-Step Double-Mix Impression Technique.

Authors:  Eduardo Batista Franco; Leonardo Fernandes da Cunha; Francyle Simões Herrera; Ana Raquel Benetti
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2011-07-25

3.  Accuracy of Multiple Pour Cast from Various Elastomer Impression Methods.

Authors:  Satheesh B Haralur; Majed Saad Toman; Abdullah Ali Al-Shahrani; Abdullah Ali Al-Qarni
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-12-14

4.  Accuracy of a separating foil impression using a novel polyolefin foil compared to a custom tray and a stock tray technique.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Pastoret; Gabriel Krastl; Julia Bühler; Roland Weiger; Nicola Ursula Zitzmann
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Clinical evaluation of final impressions from three-dimensional printed custom trays.

Authors:  Yuchun Sun; Hu Chen; Hong Li; Kehui Deng; Tian Zhao; Yong Wang; Yongsheng Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Evaluation of Elastomeric Impression Materials' Hydrophilicity: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Anna Theocharidou; Konstantinos Tzimas; Kosmas Tolidis; Dimitrios Tortopidis
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2021-09

7.  Dimensional accuracy of stone casts obtained with multiple pours into the same mold.

Authors:  Valdimar da Silva Valente; Artêmio Luiz Zanetti; Pedro Paulo Feltrin; Ricardo Tatsuo Inoue; Carmem Dolores Vilarinho Soares de Moura; Luiz Evaldo de Moura Pádua
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2012-12-24

8.  Evaluation of the quality of fixed prosthesis impressions in private laboratories in a sample from Yemen.

Authors:  Nusaiba M Al-Odinee; Mohsen Al-Hamzi; Ibrahim Z Al-Shami; Ahmed Madfa; Abdulwahab I Al-Kholani; Yazeed M Al-Olofi
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.757

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.