Literature DB >> 11965003

Digital photography for rhinoplasty.

Gregory M Galdino1, Dennis DaSilva And, Jack P Gunter.   

Abstract

Standardized, high-quality, preoperative photographs of the nose are critical for preoperative rhinoplasty planning, comparative postoperative assessment, and demonstration of surgical results. To produce these high-quality, reproducible photographs, it is essential to standardize lighting, to properly position the patient in standard views, to avoid lens distortion, and to maintain consistent camera-to-subject distances. Traditional photographic standards have been well documented in the literature; however, most do not address digital photography, and none address digital photography for rhinoplasty. Certain variables in digital photography that are not present in 35-mm photography can be critical to the appearance of the final image. Variables such as image color and contrast (which usually vary between digital cameras), focal length differences between 35-mm and most digital cameras, the effect of resolution and compression on image quality, and the effect of the printing method used can affect the appearance of the external anatomy of the nose in the final print or image. Lack of detail in the external nasal anatomy becomes an issue if the surgeon uses the photograph intraoperatively for reference, as the authors do. Initially, the authors experienced difficulties with observing subtleties in the tip-defining points and tip anatomy using digital photography when compared with our traditional methods of 35-mm photography. The lack of detail in the external anatomy was most prevalent in the frontal and basal views. Thus, the authors have since tailored their photographic methods to document the rhinoplasty patient to maximize the visual information of the external nasal anatomy in the photographic and the printed image. This article is intended to review the photographic principles for standardized rhinoplasty photography, address the additional considerations necessary when using digital photography, discuss the printing variables that can affect overall quality of the printed image, and discuss the authors' new method of photographing the rhinoplasty patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11965003     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200204010-00035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  9 in total

Review 1.  Perceived Age as a Mortality and Comorbidity Predictor: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Francisco R Avila; Ricardo A Torres-Guzman; Karla C Maita; John P Garcia; Clifton R Haider; Olivia A Ho; Rickey E Carter; Christopher J McLeod; Charles J Bruce; Antonio J Forte
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Establishing Photographic Standards for Facial Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Erin M Wolfe; Guillermo Najera-Sweeney; Zoe P Berman; Allyson R Alfonso; Gustave K Diep; Elie P Ramly; Eduardo D Rodriguez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-05-14

3.  Rhinoplasty planning with an iPhone app: analysis of otolaryngologists response.

Authors:  Francesc Larrosa; Maria J Dura; Josep Roura; Anabella Hernandez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  The art and science of photography in hand surgery.

Authors:  Keming Wang; Evan J Kowalski; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  Rhinoplasty - indications and techniques.

Authors:  Abel-Jan Tasman
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-03-14

6.  Innovative use of opsite flexigrid(™) for digital photography in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Denis Codazzi; Maria Alessandra Bocchiotti; Bernardo Righi; Enrico Robotti
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2013-01

7.  Clinical Photography for Periorbital and Facial Aesthetic Practice.

Authors:  Akshay Gopinathan Nair; Aparna Santhanam
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

8.  Hair Transplant Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Venkatram Mysore; Muthuvel Kumaresan; Anil Garg; Aman Dua; Aniketh Venkatram; Kapil Dua; Mayank Singh; C Madura; Ram Chandran; Rajendra Singh Rajput; Sandeep Sattur; Sukhbir Singh
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep

9.  Evolution of photography in maxillofacial surgery: from analog to 3D photography - an overview.

Authors:  Heidrun Schaaf; Christoph Yves Malik; Hans-Peter Howaldt; Philipp Streckbein
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2009-09-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.