Literature DB >> 11964253

Proteins wriggle.

Michael Cahill1, Sean Cahill, Kevin Cahill.   

Abstract

We propose an algorithmic strategy for improving the efficiency of Monte Carlo searches for the low-energy states of proteins. Our strategy is motivated by a model of how proteins alter their shapes. In our model, when proteins fold under physiological conditions, their backbone dihedral angles change synchronously in groups of four or more to avoid steric clashes and respect the kinematic conservation laws. They wriggle; they do not thrash. We describe a simple algorithm that can be used to incorporate wriggling in Monte Carlo simulations of protein folding. We have tested this wriggling algorithm against a code in which the dihedral angles are varied independently (thrashing). Our standard of success is the average root-mean-square distance (rmsd) between the alpha-carbons of the folding protein and those of its native structure. After 100,000 Monte Carlo sweeps, the relative decrease in the mean rmsd, as one switches from thrashing to wriggling, rises from 11% for the protein 3LZM with 164 amino acids (aa) to 40% for the protein 1A1S with 313 aa and 47% for the protein 16PK with 415 aa. These results suggest that wriggling is useful and that its utility increases with the size of the protein. One may implement wriggling on a parallel computer or a computer farm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11964253      PMCID: PMC1302055          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75608-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  5 in total

1.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-05-01

2.  Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-05-07       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Dominant forces in protein folding.

Authors:  K A Dill
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1990-08-07       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Dynamics of conformational transitions in polymers.

Authors:  E Helfand
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-11-09       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Origins of structure in globular proteins.

Authors:  H S Chan; K A Dill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  LMProt: an efficient algorithm for Monte Carlo sampling of protein conformational space.

Authors:  Roosevelt Alves da Silva; Léo Degrève; Antonio Caliri
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction.

Authors:  Colin A Smith; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Structure-based modeling of protein: DNA specificity.

Authors:  Adam P Joyce; Chi Zhang; Philip Bradley; James J Havranek
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Full cyclic coordinate descent: solving the protein loop closure problem in Calpha space.

Authors:  Wouter Boomsma; Thomas Hamelryck
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.