Literature DB >> 11963279

The contribution of tactile reafference to temporal regularity during bimanual finger tapping.

Knut Drewing1, Mareike Hennings, Gisa Aschersleben.   

Abstract

In a repetitive tapping task, the within-hand variability of intertap intervals is reduced when participants tap with both hands, as opposed to single-handed tapping. This bimanual advantage can be attributed to timer variance (according to the Wing-Kristofferson model). Separate timers have been proposed for each hand whose outputs are then averaged (Helmuth & Ivry, 1996, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 278-293). Alternatively, timing might be based on sensory reafference and the bimanual advantage due to the enhancement of sensory reafferences. This alternative hypothesis was tested in three experiments. In the first experiment, we replicated the bimanual advantage in tapping with two fingers of the same hand compared with single finger tapping. In the second experiment, we demonstrated that the bimanual advantage decreased when tactile reafferences from left-hand taps were omitted (by contact-free tapping). In the third experiment, participants tapped bimanually with the index fingers of both hands firmly mechanically coupled. The bimanual advantage was replicated for this condition. Results are consistent with the assumption that the bimanual advantage is due to the sensory reafferences of the second hand. We suggest that our results are best explained by a reformulation of the Wing-Kristofferson model, in which the timer provides action goals in terms of sensory reafferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11963279     DOI: 10.1007/s004260100074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  10 in total

1.  Asymmetry of interhemispheric interaction in left-handed subjects.

Authors:  Bettina Pollok; Joachim Gross; Alfons Schnitzler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  An internal clock generates repetitive predictive saccades.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Mark Shelhamer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Coupling between cerebellar hemispheres: behavioural, anatomic, and functional data.

Authors:  Bettina Pollok; Markus Butz; Joachim Gross; Martin Südmeyer; Lars Timmermann; Alfons Schnitzler
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 4.  Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006-2012).

Authors:  Bruno H Repp; Yi-Huang Su
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

Review 5.  Time Perception for Musical Rhythms: Sensorimotor Perspectives on Entrainment, Simulation, and Prediction.

Authors:  Jessica M Ross; Ramesh Balasubramaniam
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-05

6.  Timing of bimanual movements and deafferentation: implications for the role of sensory movement effects.

Authors:  Knut Drewing; Prisca Stenneken; Jonathan Cole; Wolfgang Prinz; Gisa Aschersleben
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Auditory feedback affects the long-range correlation of isochronous serial interval production: support for a closed-loop or memory model of timing.

Authors:  Guy Madison; Didier Delignières
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Crossing the arms confuses the clocks: sensory feedback and the bimanual advantage.

Authors:  Breanna E Studenka; Kinga L Eliasz; David I Shore; Ramesh Balasubramaniam
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

9.  Monkey see, monkey tap: mimicry of movement dynamics during coordinated tapping.

Authors:  Carolyn Kroger; Florian A Kagerer; J Devin McAuley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Offline Optimization of the Relative Timing of Movements in a Sequence Is Blocked by Retroactive Behavioral Interference.

Authors:  Jason Friedman; Maria Korman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.