Literature DB >> 11959567

Pharmacodynamic activity and efficacy of linezolid in a rat model of pneumococcal pneumonia.

Martha J Gentry-Nielsen1, Keith M Olsen, Laurel C Preheim.   

Abstract

Linezolid is a new oxazolidinone antibiotic with potent activity against gram-positive bacteria, including Streptococcus pneumoniae. The pharmacodynamic activity and in vivo efficacy of linezolid were compared to those of ceftriaxone in an immunocompetent rat model of pneumococcal pneumonia. Rats infected intratracheally with 8 x 10(7) CFU of a penicillin-sensitive (MIC, 0.032 microg/ml) strain of S. pneumoniae were treated for 5 days beginning 18 h postinfection. Groups of rats were sham treated with oral phosphate-buffered saline or received oral liquid linezolid at 25 or 50 mg/kg of body weight twice a day (b.i.d.) or subcutaneous ceftriaxone at 100 mg/kg once daily. Mortality was monitored for 10 days postinfection; blood culturing was performed on day 1 (pretreatment) and on days 3, 5, and 10 postinfection for the determination of bacteremia. Serum also was collected for the determination of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters at 30 min and at 3, 5, and 12 h (linezolid) or 3, 5, and 24 h (ceftriaxone) postdose. The cumulative mortality rates were 100% for the sham-treated group, 58.3% for the low-dose linezolid group, 8.3% for the high-dose linezolid group, and 0% for the ceftriaxone group. Rats in each of the antibiotic treatment groups had significantly fewer bacteria (P < 0.00001) in their bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) on day 3 postinfection than sham-treated rats. There also were significantly fewer organisms in the BALF of rats treated with ceftriaxone than in the BALF of rats treated with either dose of linezolid. Oral linezolid at 50 mg/kg b.i.d. therefore was as effective as ceftriaxone in experimental pneumococcal pneumonia, whereas the 25-mg/kg b.i.d. dose was significantly less effective. All pharmacodynamic parameters reflected efficacy and were significantly different for the two dosage regimens of linezolid (P < 0.01). However, the free-fraction pharmacodynamic parameters predictive of outcome were a value of >39% for the percentage of time in the experimental dosing interval during which the linezolid concentration exceeded the MIC and a value of >147 for the ratio of the area under the serum concentration-time curve to the MIC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11959567      PMCID: PMC127197          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.5.1345-1351.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  26 in total

1.  Activity of linezolid against Gram-positive cocci possessing genes conferring resistance to protein synthesis inhibitors.

Authors:  M Fines; R Leclercq
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Determination of linezolid in plasma by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.

Authors:  G W Peng; R P Stryd; S Murata; M Igarashi; K Chiba; H Aoyama; M Aoyama; T Zenki; N Ozawa
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.935

3.  Efficacy of linezolid in experimental otitis media.

Authors:  S I Pelton; M Figueira; R Albut; D Stalker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Failure of intensive care unit support to influence mortality from pneumococcal bacteremia.

Authors:  E W Hook; C A Horton; D R Schaberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-02-25       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Capsular types and outcome of bacteremic pneumococcal disease in the antibiotic era.

Authors:  M A Mufson; D M Kruss; R E Wasil; W I Metzger
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1974-09

6.  In vitro activities of linezolid against important gram-positive bacterial pathogens including vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  G A Noskin; F Siddiqui; V Stosor; D Hacek; L R Peterson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Emerging therapies for serious gram-positive bacterial infections: a focus on linezolid.

Authors:  J F Plouffe
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Ethanol feeding does not affect the efficacy or pharmacokinetics of azithromycin, trovafloxacin, or ceftriaxone in a rat model of pneumococcal pneumonia.

Authors:  L C Preheim; K M Olsen; M Yue; M U Snitily; M J Gentry
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Mechanism of action of oxazolidinones: effects of linezolid and eperezolid on translation reactions.

Authors:  D L Shinabarger; K R Marotti; R W Murray; A H Lin; E P Melchior; S M Swaney; D S Dunyak; W F Demyan; J M Buysse
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Oxazolidinones: a review.

Authors:  D I Diekema; R N Jones
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 11.431

View more
  9 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of unbound linezolid in plasma and tissue interstitium of critically ill patients after multiple dosing using microdialysis.

Authors:  Cornelia Buerger; Nele Plock; Pejman Dehghanyar; Christian Joukhadar; Charlotte Kloft
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Effect of ethanol on fluoroquinolone efficacy in a rat model of pneumococcal pneumonia.

Authors:  Keith M Olsen; Martha Gentry-Nielsen; Mei Yue; Mary U Snitily; Laurel C Preheim
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Augmented renal clearance: implications for antibacterial dosing in the critically ill.

Authors:  Andrew A Udy; Jason A Roberts; Robert J Boots; David L Paterson; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Current concepts in antimicrobial therapy against select gram-positive organisms: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, penicillin-resistant pneumococci, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  Ana Maria Rivera; Helen W Boucher
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Pharmacokinetics of linezolid in septic patients with and without extended dialysis.

Authors:  Stefanie Swoboda; Michael C Ober; Christoph Lichtenstern; Soundos Saleh; Vedat Schwenger; Hans-Günther Sonntag; Walter Emil Haefeli; Georg Hempel; Torsten Hoppe-Tichy; Markus A Weigand
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Comparative pharmacodynamics of the new oxazolidinone tedizolid phosphate and linezolid in a neutropenic murine Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia model.

Authors:  Alexander J Lepak; Karen Marchillo; Solen Pichereau; William A Craig; David R Andes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Concentrations in plasma, urinary excretion, and bactericidal activity of linezolid (600 milligrams) versus those of ciprofloxacin (500 milligrams) in healthy volunteers receiving a single oral dose.

Authors:  Florian M E Wagenlehner; Stephan Wydra; Hajime Onda; Martina Kinzig-Schippers; Fritz Sörgel; Kurt G Naber
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Pharmacokinetics and efficacy of linezolid in a gerbil model of Streptococcus pneumoniae-induced acute otitis media.

Authors:  William R Humphrey; Mark H Shattuck; Raymond J Zielinski; Ming-Shang T Kuo; John J Biermacher; Donald P Smith; Jana L Jensen; Ronda D Schaadt; Gary E Zurenko; Ivan M Richards
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  In vitro and in vivo activities of linezolid alone and combined with vancomycin and imipenem against Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides.

Authors:  S Ribes; M E Pachón-Ibáñez; M A Domínguez; R Fernández; F Tubau; J Ariza; F Gudiol; C Cabellos
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.267

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.