Literature DB >> 11959053

Utility of history, physical examination, electrocardiogram, and chest radiograph for differentiating normal from decreased systolic function in patients with heart failure.

James T Thomas1, Russell F Kelly, Smitha J Thomas, Thomas D Stamos, Khaled Albasha, Joseph E Parrillo, James E Calvin.   

Abstract

To determine whether clinical parameters alone can differentiate normal versus decreased systolic left ventricular function in patients with heart failure. Detailed clinical data were collected prospectively from 225 consecutive patients who were hospitalized with heart failure. Findings in patients with normal (ejection fraction > or =45%) or decreased (ejection fraction <45%) left ventricular function were compared. Systolic function was normal in 104 patients (46%) and decreased in 121 patients (54%). Patients with normal function were older (mean [+/- SD] age, 59 +/- 13 years vs. 54 +/- 13 years, P = 0.007) and more likely to be female (56% vs. 35%, P = 0.001), obese (body mass index > or =30 kg/m(2), 62% vs. 48%, P = 0.04), have marked systolic (> or =160 mm Hg, 50% vs. 27%, P <0.001) and diastolic (> or =110 mm Hg, 25% vs. 13%, P = 0.02) hypertension, and use calcium antagonists (34% vs. 14%, P = 0.001). Patients with decreased function were more likely to use alcohol (37% vs. 20%, P = 0.007), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (85% vs. 62%, P <0.001), and digoxin (57% vs. 27%, P <0.001); and more likely to have tachycardia (51% vs. 32%, P = 0.004), rales (89% vs. 80%, P = 0.05), electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (42% vs. 22%, P = 0.002), left atrial abnormality (52% vs. 22%, P <0.001), or flow cephalization on chest radiograph (91% vs. 79%, P = 0.02). Only sex, tachycardia, and use of digoxin and ACE inhibitors were associated with ventricular function in multivariable analysis. However, the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for all clinical variables were low. Differences in clinical parameters in heart failure patients with decreased versus normal systolic function cannot predict systolic function in these patients, supporting recommendations that heart failure patients should undergo specialized testing to measure ventricular function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11959053     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01048-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  20 in total

Review 1.  Handcarried echocardiography to assess hemodynamics in acute decompensated heart failure.

Authors:  Sascha N Goonewardena; Kirk T Spencer
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2010-12

2.  Methods of monitoring shock.

Authors:  Ednan K Bajwa; Atul Malhotra; B Taylor Thompson
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.119

3.  Cardiopulmonary assessment: is improvement needed?

Authors:  Joseph M Van De Water; Martin L Dalton; David C Parish; Robert L Vogel; John C Beatty; Said O Adeniyi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Diagnosis of heart failure in primary care.

Authors:  Cândida Fonseca
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 5.  Canadian Cardiovascular Society Consensus Conference recommendations on heart failure update 2007: Prevention, management during intercurrent illness or acute decompensation, and use of biomarkers.

Authors:  J Malcom O Arnold; Jonathan G Howlett; Paul Dorian; Anique Ducharme; Nadia Giannetti; Haissam Haddad; George A Heckman; Andrew Ignaszewski; Debra Isaac; Philip Jong; Peter Liu; Elizabeth Mann; Robert S McKelvie; Gordon W Moe; John D Parker; Anna M Svendsen; Ross T Tsuyuki; Kelly O'Halloran; Heather J Ross; Vivek Rao; Errol J Sequeira; Michel White
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  Association of diastolic dysfunction and outcomes in ambulatory older adults with chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Ali Ahmed
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  Prevalence and prognostic implications of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in heart failure: evidence from the CHARM programme.

Authors:  N M Hawkins; D Wang; J J V McMurray; M A Pfeffer; K Swedberg; C B Granger; S Yusuf; S J Pocock; J Ostergren; E L Michelson; F G Dunn
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-09-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Biomarkers in heart failure: a clinical review.

Authors:  J Paul Rocchiccioli; John J V McMurray; Anna F Dominiczak
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 9.  Management of heart failure in the elderly.

Authors:  Roger Kerzner; Michael W Rich
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Heart failure with preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial.

Authors:  Barry R Davis; John B Kostis; Lara M Simpson; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Paula T Einhorn; Michael A Farber; Charles E Ford; Daniel Levy; Barry M Massie; Shah Nawaz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.