BACKGROUND: The output of major surgeries in eastern Africa is low and varies considerably between hospitals and regions. This study in rural Uganda relates surgical output to number of hospital beds, number of in-patient admissions, number of new out-patient visits, estimated catchment area population and number of doctors and nurses. This was to facilitate comparison between institutions and areas and to determine surgical resource needs. OBJECTIVES: To describe the quantitative output of surgery in a Ugandan district and to demonstrate the use of standardised indicators for the purpose of comparison, monitoring, resource needs assessment and planning. DATA SOURCES: Retrospective review and analysis of inpatient and outpatient records at Kagadi district hospital, Kibaale district, Western Uganda, the only hospital providing major surgery in the district. STUDY SELECTION: Data on all recorded major and minor surgical operations in the hospital during two complete calendar years, 1996 and 1997. DATA SYNTHESIS: In 1996 and 1997 there were 331 and 309 major operations performed respectively in Kagadi hospital, Kibaale district. This output corresponded to 3.3 and 3.1 per 100 beds; 270 and 270 per 1,000 in-patient admissions; 328 and 267 per year per 10,000 new out-patient visits; 166 and 155 per 100,000 catchment area population; 83 and 77 per doctor; 27.6 and 25.8 per nurse. Minor surgery output at the same hospital in 1996 and 1997 were 185 and 190 respectively. This corresponded to 183 and 164 per 10,000 new outpatient visits and 93 and 95 operations per 100,000 catchment area population. CONCLUSIONS: The output of surgery in the district was very low in comparison with Europe and North America but within the range common in Eastern Africa. For planning and performance review purposes the most useful indicators are surgical output per 100 beds per year; per 1000 inpatient admissions; per doctor and per nurse per year because they measure workload against available resources. Output per 100,000 estimated catchment area population is useful in relating output to need. These indicators are recommended to be incorporated in district and hospital performance reviews and in annual reports.
BACKGROUND: The output of major surgeries in eastern Africa is low and varies considerably between hospitals and regions. This study in rural Uganda relates surgical output to number of hospital beds, number of in-patient admissions, number of new out-patient visits, estimated catchment area population and number of doctors and nurses. This was to facilitate comparison between institutions and areas and to determine surgical resource needs. OBJECTIVES: To describe the quantitative output of surgery in a Ugandan district and to demonstrate the use of standardised indicators for the purpose of comparison, monitoring, resource needs assessment and planning. DATA SOURCES: Retrospective review and analysis of inpatient and outpatient records at Kagadi district hospital, Kibaale district, Western Uganda, the only hospital providing major surgery in the district. STUDY SELECTION: Data on all recorded major and minor surgical operations in the hospital during two complete calendar years, 1996 and 1997. DATA SYNTHESIS: In 1996 and 1997 there were 331 and 309 major operations performed respectively in Kagadi hospital, Kibaale district. This output corresponded to 3.3 and 3.1 per 100 beds; 270 and 270 per 1,000 in-patient admissions; 328 and 267 per year per 10,000 new out-patient visits; 166 and 155 per 100,000 catchment area population; 83 and 77 per doctor; 27.6 and 25.8 per nurse. Minor surgery output at the same hospital in 1996 and 1997 were 185 and 190 respectively. This corresponded to 183 and 164 per 10,000 new outpatient visits and 93 and 95 operations per 100,000 catchment area population. CONCLUSIONS: The output of surgery in the district was very low in comparison with Europe and North America but within the range common in Eastern Africa. For planning and performance review purposes the most useful indicators are surgical output per 100 beds per year; per 1000 inpatient admissions; per doctor and per nurse per year because they measure workload against available resources. Output per 100,000 estimated catchment area population is useful in relating output to need. These indicators are recommended to be incorporated in district and hospital performance reviews and in annual reports.
Authors: Caris E Grimes; Rebekah S L Law; Eric S Borgstein; Nyeno C Mkandawire; Christopher B D Lavy Journal: World J Surg Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Isabeau A Walker; Apunyo D Obua; Falan Mouton; Steven Ttendo; Iain H Wilson Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2010-06-07 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Moses Galukande; Johan von Schreeb; Andreas Wladis; Naboth Mbembati; Helder de Miranda; Margaret E Kruk; Sam Luboga; Alphonsus Matovu; Colin McCord; S Khady Ndao-Brumblay; Doruk Ozgediz; Peter C Rockers; Ana Romàn Quiñones; Fernando Vaz; Haile T Debas; Sarah B Macfarlane Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 11.069