Literature DB >> 11956424

The Dretler stone cone: a device to prevent ureteral stone migration-the initial clinical experience.

Mahesh R Desai1, Sanjiv B Patel, Mihir M Desai, Rajesh Kukreja, Ravindra B Sabnis, Rasesh M Desai, Snehal H Patel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Retrograde stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy occurs in 5% to 40% of proximal and distal ureteral stone cases. This migration increases morbidity and the need for auxiliary procedures. The Dretler stone cone (Medsource, Norwell, Massachusetts) is a novel device to prevent proximal stone migration and facilitate fragment extraction during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. We assessed the safety and efficacy of the Dretler stone cone in the clinical setting and compared it prospectively with a conventional flat wire basket during ureteroscopy for ureteral calculi.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To our knowledge we report the initial clinical use of the Dretler stone cone in 50 consecutive patients with ureteral calculi undergoing ureteroscopic extraction. Calculi were situated above the sacroiliac joint in 24 cases, over the sacroiliac joint in 15 and below the sacroiliac joint in 11. Pneumatic lithotripsy was done in 42 cases. In the remaining 8 cases ureteroscopic (3) or fluoroscopic (5) intact stone extraction was performed. The later 23 cases using the Dretler stone cone were prospectively compared with 20 of ureteroscopic intracorporeal lithotripsy using a standard flat wire basket.
RESULTS: The Dretler stone cone was successfully placed in all 50 cases. In 41 patients it was placed via cystoscopy under fluoroscopic guidance, while 9 impacted stones required ureteroscopic placement. Six patients in whom the Dretler stone cone was used had residual fragments less than 3 mm. No patient required auxiliary procedures. In the prospective trial no patients in Dretler stone cone group had residual fragments greater than 3 mm. or required auxiliary procedures. However, in the flat wire basket group residual stones greater than 3 mm. were present in 6 cases (30%, p <0.001), while auxiliary procedures were required in 4 (20%, p <0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The Dretler stone cone represents a new generation of basketry that minimizes proximal ureteral stone migration and allows safe extraction of fragments during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. In our experience it is associated with a lower incidence of significant residual fragments and fewer auxiliary procedures than conventional flat wire baskets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11956424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  23 in total

Review 1.  Holmium laser for stone management.

Authors:  Sean Pierre; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Updates in endourology.

Authors:  Victor Palit; Adrian D Joyce
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Efficacy and safety of the Accordion stone-trapping device: in vitro results from an artificial ureterolithotripsy model.

Authors:  Peter Jochen Olbert; Christian Keil; Jost Weber; Andres J Schrader; Axel Hegele; Rainer Hofmann
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-11-27

4.  Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of obstructive upper ureteral calculi with concurrent urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Jun-Tao Jiang; Wei-Guo Li; Yi-Ping Zhu; Wen-Lan Sun; Wei Zhao; Yuan Ruan; Chen Zhong; Kristofer Wood; Hai-Bin Wei; Shu-Jie Xia; Xiao-Wen Sun
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Dual usage of a stone basket: Stone capture and retropulsion prevention.

Authors:  Tadeusz Kroczak; Daniela Ghiculete; Robert Sowerby; Michael Ordon; Jason Y Lee; Kenneth T Pace; John R Honey
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Preventing stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Osama M Elashry; Ahmad M Tawfik
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in comparison with ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted upper ureteral stones larger than 12 mm.

Authors:  Yuan Shao; Da-wei Wang; Guo-liang Lu; Zhou-jun Shen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Update on ureteroscopy instrumentation.

Authors:  Renato N Pedro; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-07

Review 9.  Ureteroscopy for the management of stone disease.

Authors:  Brian H Eisner; Michael P Kurtz; Stephen P Dretler
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Accessory instrumentation in flexible ureteroscopy: Evidence-based recommendation.

Authors:  Timothy Holden; Renato Nardi Pedro; Monoj Monga
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.