Literature DB >> 11955812

Comparison of the mechanical destructive force in the small intestine of dog and human.

Masaharu Kamba1, Yasuo Seta, Akira Kusai, Kenji Nishimura.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the destructive force that oral solid dosage forms receive in the small intestine of dogs and humans. Information on the mechanical destructive forces of the gastrointestinal tract (GI) helps formulation design research in the following way: (1) to improve the predictability of the dissolution test since in vivo drug release is affected by not only agitation intensity but also mechanical stress; (2) to design safe and robust products by avoiding dose-dumping or unintended drug release at an inadequate site; (3) to better understand the species difference in bioavailability by comparing the destructive forces against dosage forms in the GI of dogs with those of humans. "Destructive force Dependent Release System" (DDRS) was developed to measure the mechanical destructive forces of the GI tract by using highly hydrophobic Teflon powder. In a DDRS, a marker drug contained in the core tablet is released only when the DDRS receives a force larger than its pre-determined crushing strength. DDRS-Small Intestine (DDRS-SI), a modified DDRS, was prepared for targeting the small intestine. DDRS-SI was encapsulated in starch capsules (Capill) and then the capsules were coated with an enteric film (DDRS-SI-Ecap). The capsules were administered to six dogs and nine human volunteers. Both dogs and human volunteers crushed a DDRS-SI having a crushing strength of 1.2 N. Therefore, these controlled-release formulations should withstand a destructive force of 1.2 N when they pass through the small intestine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11955812     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5173(02)00043-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pharm        ISSN: 0378-5173            Impact factor:   5.875


  10 in total

1.  Simulating the hydrodynamic conditions in the United States Pharmacopeia paddle dissolution apparatus.

Authors:  Leonard G McCarthy; Carolin Kosiol; Anne Marie Healy; Geoff Bradley; James C Sexton; Owen I Corrigan
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  A novel beads-based dissolution method for the in vitro evaluation of extended release HPMC matrix tablets and the correlation with the in vivo data.

Authors:  Uroš Klančar; Boštjan Markun; Saša Baumgartner; Igor Legen
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  A novel approach in distinguishing between role of hydrodynamics and mechanical stresses similar to contraction forces of GI tract on drug release from modified release dosage forms.

Authors:  Majde Takieddin; Reza Fassihi
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  Correlating cellulose derivative intrinsic viscosity with mechanical susceptibility of swollen hydrophilic matrix tablets.

Authors:  Uroš Klančar; Matej Horvat; Saša Baumgartner
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Drug formulations intended for the global market should be tested for stability under tropical climatic conditions.

Authors:  P G Risha; C Vervaet; G Vergote; L Van Bortel; J P Remon
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  In vivo performance of an oral MR matrix tablet formulation in the beagle dog in the fed and fasted state: assessment of mechanical weakness.

Authors:  Fiona McInnes; Nicola Clear; Michael Humphrey; Howard N E Stevens
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Development of Paroxetine Hydrochloride Single Layer Controlled-Release Tablets Based on 3² Factorial Design.

Authors:  Yao Yang; Zhengwei Huang; Xuan Zhang; Jinyuan Li; Ying Huang; Wanxin Chen; Xin Pan; Chuanbin Wu
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 6.321

8.  Magnetic Resonance Methods as a Prognostic Tool for the Biorelevant Behavior of Xanthan Tablets.

Authors:  Urša Mikac; Julijana Kristl
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  IVIVC for Extended Release Hydrophilic Matrix Tablets in Consideration of Biorelevant Mechanical Stress.

Authors:  Valentyn Mohylyuk; Seyedreza Goldoozian; Gavin P Andrews; Andriy Dashevskiy
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Gel Strength of Hydrophilic Matrix Tablets in Terms of In Vitro Robustness.

Authors:  Seyedreza Goldoozian; Valentyn Mohylyuk; Andriy Dashevskiy; Roland Bodmeier
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.200

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.