PURPOSE: To evaluate the behaviour of an oral matrix modified release formulation in the canine gastrointestinal tract, and establish if a mechanical weakness previously observed in clinical studies would have been identified in the dog model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro release profiles were obtained for two modified release matrix tablets containing UK-294,315, designed to release over either 6 (formulation A) or 18 (formulation B) hours. Tablets were labelled with (153)samarium and in vivo pharmacoscintigraphy studies were performed in four beagle dogs in the fasted state for both formulations, and following ingestion of an FDA high fat meal for formulation B. RESULTS: The matrix tablet formulations displayed significantly different in vitro release profiles (F (2) < 50), with time to 80% release for formulation A and B of 406 and 987 min respectively. Complete in vivo disintegration occurred at 339 +/- 181 and 229 +/- 171 for formulation A and B respectively in the fasted state, and at 207 +/- 154 min for formulation B in the fed state, in disagreement with in vitro release. CONCLUSION: The fed/fasted dog model would have predicted a lack of physical robustness in the matrix tablet formulation B, however it would not have predicted the clear fed/fasted effects on performance observed previously in man.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the behaviour of an oral matrix modified release formulation in the caninegastrointestinal tract, and establish if a mechanical weakness previously observed in clinical studies would have been identified in the dog model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro release profiles were obtained for two modified release matrix tablets containing UK-294,315, designed to release over either 6 (formulation A) or 18 (formulation B) hours. Tablets were labelled with (153)samarium and in vivo pharmacoscintigraphy studies were performed in four beagle dogs in the fasted state for both formulations, and following ingestion of an FDA high fat meal for formulation B. RESULTS: The matrix tablet formulations displayed significantly different in vitro release profiles (F (2) < 50), with time to 80% release for formulation A and B of 406 and 987 min respectively. Complete in vivo disintegration occurred at 339 +/- 181 and 229 +/- 171 for formulation A and B respectively in the fasted state, and at 207 +/- 154 min for formulation B in the fed state, in disagreement with in vitro release. CONCLUSION: The fed/fasted dog model would have predicted a lack of physical robustness in the matrix tablet formulation B, however it would not have predicted the clear fed/fasted effects on performance observed previously in man.
Authors: Kilian Kelly; Bridget O'Mahony; Blythe Lindsay; Tamara Jones; Tim J Grattan; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Howard N E Stevens; Clive G Wilson Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Yunhui Wu; Alice Loper; Elizabeth Landis; Lisa Hettrick; Linda Novak; Kari Lynn; Cindy Chen; Karen Thompson; Ray Higgins; Udit Batra; Suhas Shelukar; Gloria Kwei; David Storey Journal: Int J Pharm Date: 2004-11-05 Impact factor: 5.875
Authors: Anthony Harrison; Alison Betts; Katherine Fenner; Kevin Beaumont; Alan Edgington; Sarah Roffey; John Davis; Pierre Comby; Paul Morgan Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.922